Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
[Behavior Blocker Test] Norton Security 2015 VS Trend Micro Internet Security 2015 (Manzaitest)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Anupam" data-source="post: 280380" data-attributes="member: 24658"><p>I did not mean to say your reviews are useless. Rather I am a fanboy of you. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>What I wanted to say is, if you judge a AV based on few samples then it is not fully correct. If you use lots of malwares to test it then every time you test, the result will be almost same.</p><p></p><p>For example.</p><p></p><p>If I use 2 sample to test one AV and one of them missed, that means it can detect/block 50%.</p><p></p><p>But if I use 2000 samples to test the same AV and that time 200 missed, then the detection is 90% and that will be a better result. It's just the concept of probability.</p><p></p><p>And your reviews only proves my point. In one of your review the same AV scored excellent but now it's a horror. The main reason behind that is for both the cases the number of samples was very less.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Anupam, post: 280380, member: 24658"] I did not mean to say your reviews are useless. Rather I am a fanboy of you. :) What I wanted to say is, if you judge a AV based on few samples then it is not fully correct. If you use lots of malwares to test it then every time you test, the result will be almost same. For example. If I use 2 sample to test one AV and one of them missed, that means it can detect/block 50%. But if I use 2000 samples to test the same AV and that time 200 missed, then the detection is 90% and that will be a better result. It's just the concept of probability. And your reviews only proves my point. In one of your review the same AV scored excellent but now it's a horror. The main reason behind that is for both the cases the number of samples was very less. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top