- Jul 13, 2014
- 766
Emsisoft did a very good job.With two scanning engines, excellent behavioural protection and a light footprint, an almost perfect product.
I am not an ESET expert but I think that if it was in interactive mode, it would have stopped most or all of the malware.mm, poor results for ESET.... Very good for Kaspersky.
With all modules activated, all products will give you a solid protection. Emsisoft wins on threat detection because of its dual-engine and very nice signature database (bitdefender + emsisoft/a2squared) and Kaspersky wins at behavior testing. It's a matter of taste which anti-virus is "the best". I like Emsisoft because it's much faster by a better detection ratio at scanning the system and network drives. If you prefer the all-in-one solution which protects you from malware files, malicious/phishing web content, spam-mails and malicious content on social media sites you'll be well served with ESET, Kaspersky or BitDefender.Thank you very much for sharing these tests bro. So based on these I wonder to know which one is giving best protection? KIS or EIS and Are you still prefer EIS over KIS? if Yes then Why?
Based on the behavioral analysis Kaspersky did the best job here - yes. But a modern anti-virus/internet security solution does not use only an anti-malware engine or only an anti-exploit/behavior module. So the behavior-test was not really a real protection test. For testing the protection ratio of an anti-malware/internet security you need to activate all components.kaspersky best thant emsisoft
Does Bitdefender pay you for your posts?Hey and thank you for the videos,but bitdefender should have scored higher,it is the best AV in the world,followed close by Kaspersky