- Mar 4, 2022
- 40
That doesn’t automatically invalidate it, but why CrowdStrike did not submit this executable for emulation? No information how they’ve been configured either.Obviously, Video is sponsored by Sophos.
It was not sponsored by Sophos, in fact, it was not sponsored at all.Obviously, Video is sponsored by Sophos.
True but this guy already promoted Sophos products during years.That doesn’t automatically invalidate
Yes, this is true. I’ve heard in many videos. But maybe he just finds them effective, not necessarily a paid promotion.True but this guy already promoted Sophos products during years.
The video was about testing EDR products, and the only reason why the home versions of Windows Defender, Bitdefender and Sophos were used was because they performed nearly identical to the business versions. And frankly, I am not surprised in the slightest that Bitdefender and Sophos performed better than the rest. CrowdStrike and SentinelOne in particular, primarily AI based antiviruses are overhyped and overmarketed. More conventional options like Bitdefender, for example, still reign supreme in the testing I've seen.Well-known brands like Avast, Norton, and Kaspersky are popular choices. Why would he test Sophos when there are more well-known brands that users typically use? Why would he show that an enterprise-grade product like CrowdStrike failed while a home product like Sophos succeeded? There might be a reason behind this. Maybe it’s not intentional, but because he has promoted Sophos for years, he might be biased.
The last minutes of every video are important, especially if the content is compelling and keeps viewers interested throughout and Sophos is there in those minutes.
This is very funny to me actually. I remember the reason why I got into HitmanPro in the first place was because of him. Then you folks showed me how it doesn't scan pdf's and scripts even when they are clearly malicious and I moved onto NPE. Lol.Yes, this is true. I’ve heard in many videos. But maybe he just finds them effective, not necessarily a paid promotion.
I am sorry to bring this to you, and people will say again that I am making software look bad, but Sophos is not anything special.This is very funny to me actually. I remember the reason why I got into HitmanPro in the first place was because of him. Then you folks showed me how it doesn't scan pdf's and scripts even when they are clearly malicious and I moved onto NPE. Lol.
I know. You aren't wrong. Kaspersky still seems to be king.I am sorry to bring this to you, and people will say again that I am making software look bad, but Sophos is not anything special.
The home version offers acceptable, but rather partial protection, compared to many other vendors.
There are better options.
The business versions come in many different packages, the complete ones are rather expensive and still rather partial.
The portfolio is rather messy.
In conclusion Sophos is OK, but nothing to write home about.
I wish if he test Avast and Kaspersky too.Well-known brands like Avast, Norton, and Kaspersky are popular choices.
I really don't care whether it is a biz product or home product. I will buy anything that works. And if the home version works and it is cheaper, I will get the cheaper version.And mixing AV for home and business users, you really have to be crazy...