Battle Best antivirus for low memory

Status
Not open for further replies.

superboy123

Level 4
Thread author
Verified
Forum Veteran
May 1, 2012
322
184
268
...
hello everyone...
I would like to ask which antivirus is better for a low spec computer (low ram/ CPU specs).
 
I expected no less of you cause it is what it has always been with you a(fantasy):D
Woahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh it appeard out of nowhere

Wm1yOrl.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rahadian Putra
Well the WSA do use 4mb and less, but if you tend to install lots of programs for testing its recovery folder can occupy more than few gb's of hdd space. Than again to talk about memory footprint in this age is pointless. Memory occupation is not the same as system speed impact. Most of anti malware industry have great products (little to no variations) and most of them protects us from our bad routines/habits. In the end what differs one from the another (in top category) is our own preferences/imagination/affiliation.
If someone want one best solution ... try the church :p
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rahadian Putra
no AV out there uses 10 mb. not yet anyway
comodo and Bitdefender free very heavy for pentium

MSE is the best option for freeware
We, on MT, have discussed a countless times already that the RAM usage is probably the less important thing for an AV to system impact.
But there was no such question here on this topic...
And, yes, again, there are AV's that uses less than 10mb of RAM
 
Status
Not open for further replies.