Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Best Antivirus vs Windows Defender: What's the difference? (PC Security Channel)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bazang" data-source="post: 1114368" data-attributes="member: 114717"><p>It is same range for new malware encountered by home users.</p><p></p><p>Some in government state that all AV is no better than 40% effective regardless of the attack types. The idea being that if one does enough large scale testing, eventually all results will converge on that 40% or lower value.</p><p></p><p>Given that I routinely deal with networks full of personnel-created holes that are under constant attack, my experience with AV is that they are ALL - every single brand and version - are unreliable. While some will catch attacks that others do not, in the end they are all far less effective than the AV lab test results lead people to believe.</p><p></p><p>The only effective solutions are system lockdown of all devices including network devices, user lockdown, and disabling of a lot of unneeded or rarely needed OS features. This is the golden rule of blue team operations whether it is Windows, Linux or some other OS.</p><p></p><p>Nobody is ever going to come up with anything more effective than this. And no, it does not make information systems unusable. They are usable but under tightly controlled policies, procedures and practices. This is how effective cybersecurity works. It is just that home users cannot handle it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bazang, post: 1114368, member: 114717"] It is same range for new malware encountered by home users. Some in government state that all AV is no better than 40% effective regardless of the attack types. The idea being that if one does enough large scale testing, eventually all results will converge on that 40% or lower value. Given that I routinely deal with networks full of personnel-created holes that are under constant attack, my experience with AV is that they are ALL - every single brand and version - are unreliable. While some will catch attacks that others do not, in the end they are all far less effective than the AV lab test results lead people to believe. The only effective solutions are system lockdown of all devices including network devices, user lockdown, and disabling of a lot of unneeded or rarely needed OS features. This is the golden rule of blue team operations whether it is Windows, Linux or some other OS. Nobody is ever going to come up with anything more effective than this. And no, it does not make information systems unusable. They are usable but under tightly controlled policies, procedures and practices. This is how effective cybersecurity works. It is just that home users cannot handle it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top