Serious Discussion Best AVs and Worst AVs in Behavioral Health

IceMan7

Level 2
Thread author
Mar 19, 2025
90
There are tons of AV tests everywhere. We also have many AV solutions on the market, which makes the choice not easy.

Which antiviruses are currently at the forefront of behavioral protection?
Which are not at the forefront but will provide at least good protection?
And which are so weak that it is worth mentioning them and warning others before they pay for an antivirus solution?
 

Bot

AI-powered Bot
Apr 21, 2016
4,846
Leading AVs in behavioral protection include Bitdefender, Norton, and Kaspersky. They offer robust protection with advanced behavioral detection.

AVs like Avast, AVG, and McAfee may not be at the forefront but still provide good protection.

However, some users have reported issues with AVs like Panda and Comodo, citing weak detection rates and false positives. Always research thoroughly before purchasing any AV solution.
 

IceMan7

Level 2
Thread author
Mar 19, 2025
90
Norton? BD and Kaspersky of course.
But Norton? Why? In my opinion, they are not the top.
BD and Kaspersky are definitely the top. Fsecure was good (solid) in the DeepGuard era. Now it is rather average.

I invite you to discuss and exchange your views. Everyone has some experience or knowledge. And this will help others in making a choice than browsing the entire internet or watching a lot of tests.
 

nickstar1

Level 12
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Dec 10, 2022
565
Norton? BD and Kaspersky of course.
But Norton? Why? In my opinion, they are not the top.
BD and Kaspersky are definitely the top. Fsecure was good (solid) in the DeepGuard era. Now it is rather average.

I invite you to discuss and exchange your views. Everyone has some experience or knowledge. And this will help others in making a choice than browsing the entire internet or watching a lot of tests.
AVG, Avast, and Norton, have all the same protection abilities. AVG is better and cheaper and offers the cleanup tool that Norton tries to spam for additional costs. AVG is the better value and can be found wayyy cheaper. it's also more complete than norton.
 

Wrecker4923

Level 2
Apr 11, 2024
61
If you are thinking about referring AV solutions to OTHER people, providing references/reasons, AV-comparatives seems specific about products. If I am not looking at THIS forum, I'd have crossed the consumer lists' "Real-World Protection Test" with "Advanced Threat Protection" (presumably more reflexive of behavioral detection), and gotten the results: "Bitdefender, ESET, Kaspersky" and then "Avast, AVG". I think these choices generally reflect the discussions on this forum as well.

Then, practicality and other considerations would kick in.
  • ESET: expensive
  • Kaspersky: banned by governments. Dr.Web is also Russian, but isn't banned; what's going on here? But the free version probably would cover you.
  • Avast, AVG: are they going to sell my data? But the free version probably would cover you.
  • Bitdefender: (find out later): why so much disk activity on update, are the updates going to ruin my SSD? The free version not as good as the paid versions for antimalware/antivirus? Taking up memory may vary from one person to another.
If your machine is powerful and cash isn't a problem, then ESET and Bitdefender seem pretty good choices.
 

IceMan7

Level 2
Thread author
Mar 19, 2025
90
AVG, Avast, and Norton, have all the same protection abilities. A
Obviously, because it's the same family today.
But I don't believe that Norton is good at behavioral protection, since recently it's not only been getting hammered in tests here or on the web (for example Youtube) by BD or Kaspersky but even by Eset, where Eset has opinions on this forum that it has poor behavioral protection. So either Norton is overpriced or Eset is underrated.
I don't know the opinions about Gdata, for example, how it does in behavioral protection.
I was heading in this topic to finally get to the point, where discussions continue in many topics. Which ones are very good in behavioral protection, which ones are good and which ones are average. Anyone who enters this topic will have black and white which AV is in which group when it comes to behavioral protection

If your machine is powerful and cash isn't a problem, then ESET and Bitdefender seem pretty good choices.
In my opinion, Kaspersky, Bitdefender and Eset have been the best AVs for years. Of course, they had their ups and downs (Kaspersky the least) but whenever you think of AVs, these three always come to mind first. But that's just my opinion.
It's not about what I want to choose. It's about simplifying the choice for everyone. Some people here sleep on the forum :D and live it, so they probably have the knowledge where they can reveal which AVs in behavioral protection are even worth considering.
 

annaegorov

Level 2
Feb 6, 2018
81
If you are thinking about referring AV solutions to OTHER people, providing references/reasons, AV-comparatives seems specific about products. If I am not looking at THIS forum, I'd have crossed the consumer lists' "Real-World Protection Test" with "Advanced Threat Protection" (presumably more reflexive of behavioral detection), and gotten the results: "Bitdefender, ESET, Kaspersky" and then "Avast, AVG". I think these choices generally reflect the discussions on this forum as well.

Then, practicality and other considerations would kick in.
  • ESET: expensive
  • Kaspersky: banned by governments. Dr.Web is also Russian, but isn't banned; what's going on here? But the free version probably would cover you.
  • Avast, AVG: are they going to sell my data? But the free version probably would cover you.
  • Bitdefender: (find out later): why so much disk activity on update, are the updates going to ruin my SSD? The free version not as good as the paid versions for antimalware/antivirus? Taking up memory may vary from one person to another.
If your machine is powerful and cash isn't a problem, then ESET and Bitdefender seem pretty good choices.
Kaspersky wouldn't give the CIA a backdoor to their product, so they got banned. IMHO
 

bazang

Level 13
Jul 3, 2024
621
There are tons of AV tests everywhere. We also have many AV solutions on the market, which makes the choice not easy.

Which antiviruses are currently at the forefront of behavioral protection?
Which are not at the forefront but will provide at least good protection?
And which are so weak that it is worth mentioning them and warning others before they pay for an antivirus solution?
Kaspersky or Bitdefender. Those are your two options for behavioral detection, but don't expect either one to save you. Both work until they don't.
 

Sephirothnight

Level 1
Sep 19, 2018
19
Hello,
It's also worth trying Symantec Endpoint Protection, client version only; it's quite good with a few small adjustments. As for Comodo, its antivirus is clearly poor; it works quite differently: It's its firewall itself that's more recommended. Despite this, Comodo antivirus or not, all its other "modules" (sandbox, HIPS, Viruscope) will do the rest, i.e., prevent or isolate the infection. So even if the antivirus (Comodo or others) doesn't detect anything, the rest of the protections will take over. Another advantage: even if you install the entire package (Comodo Internet Security), it remains one of the lightest I've tested. After that, it's also a personal choice: choose the one that suits YOU best.
 

IceMan7

Level 2
Thread author
Mar 19, 2025
90
The best in terms of behavioral protection are agreed.
And what is slightly worse and may not reach the results of BD and Kaspersky but does not have to be too ashamed.
 

TairikuOkami

Level 38
Verified
Top Poster
Content Creator
Well-known
May 13, 2017
2,754
We also have many AV solutions on the market, which makes the choice not easy.
It might seems so, but not really, there are like 10 effective to chose from. There are many local AVs, but not all are worth using worldwide like K7.
Avast = AVG, Avira and Adaware use Bitdefender, you can pick based on the GUI. F-Secure, GData, Norton and Total AV offer maybe too much.
And which are so weak
Definitely Panda, but I still recommend it as a basic supplement, it is fast and light, though it causes a long shutdown. Quihoo360 is questionable, but nice. Defender is the category by itself.
 

lostpass

New Member
Mar 29, 2025
1
Kaspersky wouldn't give the CIA a backdoor to their product, so they got banned. IMHO
Ivan Kwiatkowski May 18, 2022
Ivan Kwiatkowski July 31, 2023

Personal news: I have resigned from my position in @Kaspersky's GReAT team.
I'm very grateful for my time there and everything the team accomplished.
I don't have any reason to believe anything I wrote about the company was untrue at the time I wrote it.

Also Kaspersky is not banned only in USA. Kaspersky is banned or restricted in Lithuania, Canada, Australia, Romania, Germany, UK, Netherlands.
 

IceMan7

Level 2
Thread author
Mar 19, 2025
90
So let's summarize what we have for now.

Behavioral protection:
Very good - Bitdefender, Kaspersky
Good (could be better) - Norton, AVG, Avast (same family), Eset, Fsecure (at least up to version 25.2)
Average - Avira, new version Fscure
Weak- Panda

Where to put the rest? I mean McAfee, Gdata, etc.

If someone disagrees, comments are welcome.
 
Last edited:

Andy Ful

From Hard_Configurator Tools
Verified
Honorary Member
Top Poster
Developer
Well-known
Dec 23, 2014
8,881
I am afraid that I do not know which of the 10 most popular AVs could have the best behavioral protection.
The main reason is that "behavioral protection" is not well defined.

Avast
Behavior Shield is an additional layer of Antivirus active protection. It monitors all processes on the device in real time for suspicious behavior that may indicate the presence of malicious code. Behavior Shield works by detecting and blocking suspicious files based on their similarity to other known threats, even if the files are not yet added to the virus definitions database.

Avira
Behavior-based detection:
Real-Time Monitoring + Anomaly Detection + Heuristic Analysis + Threat Intelligence Integration + Machine Learning and AI + Dynamic Analysis + User Feedback Loop
https://www.jamesparker.dev/aviras-behavior-based-detection-mechanisms/

Bitdefender
Behavior-based protection:
Internet Security stops emerging threats by analyzing the behavior of a given program or process in a virtual environment before it is executed. If it is deemed safe to run, Internet Security continues to analyze the process while it's running to identify likely threats that have not yet been reported.

Crowdstrike
Behavioral protection:
Relying solely on signature-based methods or indicators of compromise (IOCs) lead to the “silent failure” that allows data breaches to occur. Effective endpoint detection and response requires behavioral approaches that search for indicators of attack (IOAs), so you are alerted of suspicious activities before a compromise can occur.

Eset
Behavioral Detection and Blocking - HIPS
ESET Host-based Intrusion Prevention System (HIPS) uses a predefined set of rules to look for suspicious activities and to monitor and scan behavioral events such as running processes, files and registry keys. When identified, HIPS reports the offending item and – if further analysis is necessary – requests deeper inspection using other ESET technology layers.
Deep Behavioral Inspection (DBI) is one of HIPS’ built-in modules that enables deeper and more granular user-mode monitoring of unknown and suspicious processes. DBI was introduced in 2019 and represents an effective antidote for evasion techniques known to be used by threat actors in the wild.

F-Secure
DeepGuard Protection
If the file scanning engines are unable identify a suspect f ile as either clean or a known threat, more sophisticated technology is brought into play. The suspect file now comes under the scrutiny of the DeepGuard module, which first checks with the security Cloud if there have been any previous reports about the file to indicate if it is safe or harmful. If there is no prior record, the module then begins monitoring the file’s behavior, at both the point of launch and while it is running. If at either point the file performs actions that appear to be harmful, or shows any characteristics of an exploit attempt, it is immediately blocked from continuing.

Kaspersky
The Behavior Detection component receives data on the actions of applications on your computer and provides this information to other protection components to improve their performance.
The Behavior Detection component utilizes Behavior Stream Signatures (BSS) for applications. BSS contain sequences of actions taken by applications that Kaspersky Endpoint Security classifies as dangerous. If application activity matches a behavior stream signature, Kaspersky Endpoint Security performs the selected responsive action. Kaspersky Endpoint Security functionality based on behavior stream signatures provides proactive defense for the computer.

Microsoft
Behavioral blocking and containment capabilities can help identify and stop threats, based on their behaviors and process trees even when the threat has started execution. Next-generation protection, EDR, and Defender for Endpoint components and features work together in behavioral blocking and containment capabilities.

Norton:
Behavioral Protection identifies emerging threats based on the behavior of files. It detects malicious code before virus definitions are available through LiveUpdate and protects you from advanced threats.

Panda
Behavioral Blocking
Hackers sometimes use techniques that involve injecting malicious code into legitimate applications in order to secretly perform dangerous actions on your computer.
Thanks to its behavior blocker, your Panda product checks all actions performed by the applications installed on your computer, blocking all those that could be dangerous to ensure your security.
Behavioral Analysis
The behavioral analysis operates as a last line of defense against malware that manages to run on a system having evaded all other detection and scanning technologies.
This protection intercepts the operations performed by the applications installed on your computer, checking them before allowing the processes to run completely. This real-time check determines whether or not processes can be run based on their behavior.

Proofpoint
Supernova Behavioral Engine better detects email patterns that fall outside of the norm, improving detection of all threat types, from business email compromise (BEC) to credential phishing and much more. It builds off the work we did with Supernova as part of Advanced BEC Defense in 2021, incorporating signals and learnings from that engine.
Here are some of the signals Supernova Behavioral Engine will use to determine if a message is malicious (as the engine evolves, we’ll add more signals):
  • Unknown sender, i.e. someone who has never communicated with you before
  • Uncommon language or sentiment, such as discussing a financial transaction for the first time)
  • Uncommon URL or subdomain
  • Unusual SaaS (software-as-a-service) tenant, which is often a sign of supplier account compromise
  • Unusual SMTP infrastructure, which is likewise indicative of possible account compromise

Sophos
Malicious behavior detection is the dynamic analysis of all programs running on the computer to detect and block activity that is known to be malicious.

Trend Micro
Malware Behavior Blocking
 
Last edited:

Andy Ful

From Hard_Configurator Tools
Verified
Honorary Member
Top Poster
Developer
Well-known
Dec 23, 2014
8,881
We should ask some questions about behavioral protection:
  1. Is it only related to the offline features of AVs or the cloud backend is included?
  2. Can it also include the file behaviors extracted by file analysis before execution or on execution (the code is loaded to memory but not executed yet)?
  3. Can it include heuristic methods?
  4. Does it include the detonation in the cloud sandbox?
  5. Does it include Machine Learning and AI?
  6. Are there some reliable tests on behavioral protection (whatever it means)?
 
Last edited:

bazang

Level 13
Jul 3, 2024
621
F-Secure
DeepGuard Protection
If the file scanning engines are unable identify a suspect f ile as either clean or a known threat, more sophisticated technology is brought into play. The suspect file now comes under the scrutiny of the DeepGuard module, which first checks with the security Cloud if there have been any previous reports about the file to indicate if it is safe or harmful. If there is no prior record, the module then begins monitoring the file’s behavior, at both the point of launch and while it is running. If at either point the file performs actions that appear to be harmful, or shows any characteristics of an exploit attempt, it is immediately blocked from continuing.
No longer exists. F-Secure no longer has DeepGuard. It uses Avira Sentry because beginning with F-Secure version 25.2 it uses Avira as the basis for its core protections.

DeepGuard has been replaced with "Behavioral Detection."
 

About us

  • MalwareTips is a community-driven platform providing the latest information and resources on malware and cyber threats. Our team of experienced professionals and passionate volunteers work to keep the internet safe and secure. We provide accurate, up-to-date information and strive to build a strong and supportive community dedicated to cybersecurity.

User Menu

Follow us

Follow us on Facebook or Twitter to know first about the latest cybersecurity incidents and malware threats.

Top