Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Bitdefender AV Plus - ATC & Antiransomware module - ransomware test
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Evjl&#039;s Rain" data-source="post: 589694" data-attributes="member: 51905"><p>signature detection is a bit outdated although it's the strength of BD. Emsisoft and kaspersky also have great signatures, even better than BD nowadays If the BB cannot protect against new threats, we should consider other products which have better a behavior blocker or other modules which are similar</p><p></p><p>petya has been there for a very long time so why can't BD include its pattern of attack in their behavior blocker? What if someone creates a new petya or mamba or other types of MBR-ransomwares, how can BD can protect us? in this video, ATC aggressive + antiransomware module failed so there is an obvious vulnerability in their software for a long period of time</p><p></p><p>emsisoft has done a much better job than BD's ATC and it's very very light, confirmed by users + it's cheaper than BD</p><p></p><p>for paid AVs, we should consider Kaskersky and Emsisoft only</p><p>When we should consider other products</p><p>1/ It should be significantly lighter than Kaspersky</p><p>2/ Kaspersky or emsisoft are restricted in your countries or their cloud networks are frequently disconnected</p><p>3/ If your regional AVs are good enough + number 2/</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Evjl's Rain, post: 589694, member: 51905"] signature detection is a bit outdated although it's the strength of BD. Emsisoft and kaspersky also have great signatures, even better than BD nowadays If the BB cannot protect against new threats, we should consider other products which have better a behavior blocker or other modules which are similar petya has been there for a very long time so why can't BD include its pattern of attack in their behavior blocker? What if someone creates a new petya or mamba or other types of MBR-ransomwares, how can BD can protect us? in this video, ATC aggressive + antiransomware module failed so there is an obvious vulnerability in their software for a long period of time emsisoft has done a much better job than BD's ATC and it's very very light, confirmed by users + it's cheaper than BD for paid AVs, we should consider Kaskersky and Emsisoft only When we should consider other products 1/ It should be significantly lighter than Kaspersky 2/ Kaspersky or emsisoft are restricted in your countries or their cloud networks are frequently disconnected 3/ If your regional AVs are good enough + number 2/ [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top