Battle Bitdefender Total Security vs F-Secure Internet Security

[potinglin]

Which product is better? F-Secure Internet Security vs Bitdefender Total Security

 

[Manzai]

• Resource Usage (eg: CPU, RAM) => F-Secure
  
• Real World System Impact => Bitdefender (with Photom)
  
• User Friendliness => F-Secure
  
• User Interface => F-Secure
  
• Level of Protection and Features (eg: Antivirus , Firewall, Behavior Blocker) => Detection : Both . Behavior Blocker : Bitdefender (AVC is better than DeepGuard)
  
• Overall Winner => Bitdefender

I vote Bitdefender

 

[jerzy601]

Personally I prefer the F-Security
I'm During use of the program.
is lightweight, easy to use, good detectability.

 

[omidomi]

of course bitdefender.

 

[Tr.H.D]

• Resource Usage (eg: CPU, RAM): F-Secure
• Real World System Impact: Bitdefender (but F-Secure is not too heavy)
• User Friendliness: F-Secure
• User Interface: F-Secure
• Level of Protection and Features (eg: Antivirus , Firewall, Behavior Blocker): Bitdefender (for its BB)
• Overall Winner: Bitdefender
  But, F-Secure is less buggy than Bitdefender. I've tried Bitdefender time by time and Windows always got crashed (fresh install). F-Secure IS does not contain so much bloatware as Bitdefender (Total).

 

[GabiCRX]

We're talking about Ram usage, user frendly and protection but lets talk about money to, F-Secure its asking to much for to litle, when Bitdefender has plenty to offer.

 

[PrMi]

Both are good. For low end computers F-Secure is a good choice whereas for high end computers Bitdefender is nice.

 

[Tony Cole]

I would not touch Bitdefender with a barge pole - too buggy! F-Secure is a good choice, but (personally) I would choose neither.