F
ForgottenSeer 107474
Thread author
I am not using Firefox (on my desktop video playing lags terribly).
I hae been looking for an alternative Chromium browser available in flatpak and it seems that Brave updates much faster than other Chromium based browsers in flatpak(e.g. Chrome).
Today (9 feb) the Update Manager informed me that I has an update (to 121.0.6167.160) and Chrome needed a SUDO approval to update, while Brave already ran 121.0.6167.161 (since 7 feb) and did not ask for update approval. So it seems that Brave updates in the flatpak container. When this is true than Brave really offers an advantage over other Chrome/Chromium browsers in Linux.
Questions:
Thanks
I hae been looking for an alternative Chromium browser available in flatpak and it seems that Brave updates much faster than other Chromium based browsers in flatpak(e.g. Chrome).
Today (9 feb) the Update Manager informed me that I has an update (to 121.0.6167.160) and Chrome needed a SUDO approval to update, while Brave already ran 121.0.6167.161 (since 7 feb) and did not ask for update approval. So it seems that Brave updates in the flatpak container. When this is true than Brave really offers an advantage over other Chrome/Chromium browsers in Linux.
Questions:
- Any other MT members using Brave on Linux in a flatpak? If so, is my conclusion correct (Brave does not need SUDO to update in the flatpak)?
- Also considering the seamlessly zero update lag, is Brave itself distributing the Linux flatpak version?
Thanks