Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 92963" data-source="post: 976100">Yes, their content marketing is great.Read my comment at Pool party protection post, it still allows 10 full dupplex data connecrions&nbsp; so how much real protection does this provide you compared with a simple websocket blockrule in AG base&nbsp; filter?JavascriptShelter (with its new tactic) and AG or uBo offer simular protection on Edge for instance.I am not telling Brave is bad, (I am using it as secondary browser also), just telling that Brave is not as brave privacy protector as you might think reading their blog post.I am also not telling that companies are not allowed to show their best version of themselves in company communication (after all blogposts are also marketing communication).Only when the impression is to much on the positive, I am responding. Again as this may sound playing claims down, all in all I am not negative looking upon Brave.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 92963, post: 976100"] Yes, their content marketing is great. Read my comment at Pool party protection post, it still allows 10 full dupplex data connecrions so how much real protection does this provide you compared with a simple websocket blockrule in AG base filter? JavascriptShelter (with its new tactic) and AG or uBo offer simular protection on Edge for instance. I am not telling Brave is bad, (I am using it as secondary browser also), just telling that Brave is not as brave privacy protector as you might think reading their blog post. I am also not telling that companies are not allowed to show their best version of themselves in company communication (after all blogposts are also marketing communication). Only when the impression is to much on the positive, I am responding. Again as this may sound playing claims down, all in all I am not negative looking upon Brave. [/QUOTE]

Verification