Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Exterminator" data-source="post: 840773" data-attributes="member: 2930"><p>I jumped in on this and voted &quot;No&quot; and here is why</p><ul>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Prevents spam.</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">I imagine not having signatures saves some bandwidth.</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">With or without images,having no signatures makes the forum pages easier to read because you are not having to look past signatures.</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Last but not least is the moderation factor,even without images it required extra moderation as some had to push the limits.</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Signatures have advantages mainly that they can increase traffic to ones website. Even though that would require [USER=1]@Jack[/USER] approval there are some who would test those limitations also.</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">The downside to that,looking at it from Jack&#039;s perspective,is that should a spammer make it past registration they can insert a link to anything in their signature legit or malicious.</li>
</ul></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="Exterminator, post: 840773, member: 2930"] I jumped in on this and voted "No" and here is why [LIST] [*]Prevents spam. [*]I imagine not having signatures saves some bandwidth. [*]With or without images,having no signatures makes the forum pages easier to read because you are not having to look past signatures. [*]Last but not least is the moderation factor,even without images it required extra moderation as some had to push the limits. [*]Signatures have advantages mainly that they can increase traffic to ones website. Even though that would require [USER=1]@Jack[/USER] approval there are some who would test those limitations also. [*]The downside to that,looking at it from Jack's perspective,is that should a spammer make it past registration they can insert a link to anything in their signature legit or malicious. [/LIST] [/QUOTE]

Verification