Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RoboMan" data-source="post: 840800" data-attributes="member: 53544">Thanks everybody who has voted so far, and special thanks to those who took the time to justify their vote (for yes or for no).I strongly think that text-only signatures wouldn&#039;t affect as much as some think, if certain criteria is implemented, for example:<ul>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Not allowed to use links (can be automatic, doesn&#039;t need moderators to check signatures, if it detects https or www then throw an error)</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Include a words filter (automatically decline signatures with insults, references to several dates like history, terrorism, etc)</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Option to hide all signatures (save bandwith, you don&#039;t like them)</li>
</ul>Also there are several places in a post where the signature can be placed, which doesn&#039;t necessarily have to consume extra space. Please refer to the picture below.[SPOILER=&quot;Image&quot;][ATTACH=full]228214[/ATTACH][/SPOILER]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RoboMan, post: 840800, member: 53544"] Thanks everybody who has voted so far, and special thanks to those who took the time to justify their vote (for yes or for no). I strongly think that text-only signatures wouldn't affect as much as some think, if certain criteria is implemented, for example: [LIST] [*]Not allowed to use links (can be automatic, doesn't need moderators to check signatures, if it detects https or www then throw an error) [*]Include a words filter (automatically decline signatures with insults, references to several dates like history, terrorism, etc) [*]Option to hide all signatures (save bandwith, you don't like them) [/LIST] Also there are several places in a post where the signature can be placed, which doesn't necessarily have to consume extra space. Please refer to the picture below. [SPOILER="Image"][ATTACH type="full"]228214[/ATTACH][/SPOILER] [/QUOTE]

Verification