Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="plat" data-source="post: 840832" data-attributes="member: 74969">Very compelling arguments, for and against.&nbsp; You wonder if signatures can dilute the power of a given message.&nbsp; I&#039;ve perceived that at Wilders a few times.&nbsp; You want the message to be pure.&nbsp; I could not picture Mr. Andy Ful with a signature, for example.&nbsp; Every post of his is a signature already.&nbsp; <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> How about hiding a sig, after it&#039;s been screened for no-nos? **&nbsp; Like those at TechPowerUp?&nbsp; Here, an example, the info is hidden under an up-down arrow:[spoiler][ATTACH=full]228220[/ATTACH][/spoiler]Sticking with the neutral vote. **sorry, I scanned everyone&#039;s post again.&nbsp; If this idea has been raised before, I apologize.&nbsp; I didn&#039;t see it, though. Edit:&nbsp; OK, DeletedMessiah offered the suggestion to hide it.&nbsp; I think this would be a good compromise.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="plat, post: 840832, member: 74969"] Very compelling arguments, for and against. You wonder if signatures can dilute the power of a given message. I've perceived that at Wilders a few times. You want the message to be pure. I could not picture Mr. Andy Ful with a signature, for example. Every post of his is a signature already. :) How about hiding a sig, after it's been screened for no-nos? ** Like those at TechPowerUp? Here, an example, the info is hidden under an up-down arrow: [spoiler][ATTACH type="full"]228220[/ATTACH][/spoiler] Sticking with the neutral vote. **sorry, I scanned everyone's post again. If this idea has been raised before, I apologize. I didn't see it, though. Edit: OK, DeletedMessiah offered the suggestion to hide it. I think this would be a good compromise. [/QUOTE]

Verification