D
Deleted member 178
McLovin said:Don't know about Chrome, but I know for Firefox/Waterfox is if you close it on purpose you will be able to restore old tabs.
same for Chrome
Startup options
Privacy Options
McLovin said:Don't know about Chrome, but I know for Firefox/Waterfox is if you close it on purpose you will be able to restore old tabs.
Umbra Corp. said:- Chrome has a sandbox and do-no-track features
- Chrome malicious site filter is better in my opinion, it block more than FF
HeffeD said:Umbra Corp. said:- Chrome has a sandbox and do-no-track features
- Chrome malicious site filter is better in my opinion, it block more than FF
Firefox also has do-not-track features. Firefox uses Google's safe browsing list, just like Chrome.
@Earth admin :- I used to use both chrome and mozilla 1 months back but my elder brother says not to install too many browsers and use only 1 and v have been using mozilla more before than chrome so i cannot try chrome on my pc .Littlebits said:HeffeD said:Umbra Corp. said:- Chrome has a sandbox and do-no-track features
- Chrome malicious site filter is better in my opinion, it block more than FF
Firefox also has do-not-track features. Firefox uses Google's safe browsing list, just like Chrome.
You are correct about the only advantage Google Chrome has over Firefox is the sandboxing (its own flash player and PDF reader) plus it pushes out updated releases more often then Firefox.
Firefox/Waterfox is my choice browser but I believe Google Chrome is more secure because of the sandbox and more into developing. But both are very close.
Thanks.
Umbra Corp. said:- FF latest version has also an update service so no differences to me.
- i disabled google update because i like to update things myself
- Chrome malicious site filter is better in my opinion, it block more than FF
bo.elam said:Umbra Corp. said:- FF latest version has also an update service so no differences to me.
- i disabled google update because i like to update things myself
- Chrome malicious site filter is better in my opinion, it block more than FF
The Firefox update service can be uninstalled. Also, during installation, you have the choice not to install it.
Like yourself, I prefer to do updates manually. I have Firefox set not to prompt when there's a new update.
A 4% blocking difference between Firefox and Chrome is meaningless when there is a 2% error margin. According to the same test:
"Firefox demonstrates the strongest protection for Zero hour phishing attacks at 79.2%". Chrome scored 53.2% in the first hour.
https://www.nsslabs.com/reports/browser-security-comparative-analysis-phishing-protection
Bo
Littlebits said:Comodo Dragon doesn't use Google Safe browsing list, it relies on Comodo DNS. If you want a more secure version of Chromium browser, use Google Chrome and add Comodo DNS then you get both blocking lists together. I don't believe there is an option to add Google Safe browsing list to Comodo Dragon.
HeffeD said:Littlebits said:Comodo Dragon doesn't use Google Safe browsing list, it relies on Comodo DNS. If you want a more secure version of Chromium browser, use Google Chrome and add Comodo DNS then you get both blocking lists together. I don't believe there is an option to add Google Safe browsing list to Comodo Dragon.
As with any Chromium browser, Google Safe Browsing is enabled by default in Comodo Dragon.
Chromium is the application that serves as the foundation for Google Chrome, with Google’s developers improving the software and adding a bunch of enhancements to make it worthy of the Google badge.
Has all of the main features as Google Chrome except it lacks:
* Google Update Service (must manually download updated zip files and extract then to a folder and delete the older version folder)
* Google's re-branded flash player (must install Adobe flash plugin)
* Google's re-branded Java applets (must install Java Runtime plugin)
* Google Documents Service (must install document readers like pdf, Microsoft Office and others to view online documents)
* Google Safe Browsing
* Various other Google Services
* Only available as a developer build
* Only is available as a portable (no installer)
Littlebits said:Google Safe Browsing was a part of Google's branding for Google Chrome only. It was not included in the Chromium open-source code just like the other services provided by Google. When was it added to Chromium open-source code?
HeffeD said:Littlebits said:Google Safe Browsing was a part of Google's branding for Google Chrome only. It was not included in the Chromium open-source code just like the other services provided by Google. When was it added to Chromium open-source code?
Look for the option to protect from phishing or malicious websites...
It's not called Safe Browsing, but it's the same list unless I'm mistaken. (Firefox also uses Google's list)