Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 943342" data-attributes="member: 32260"><p>My attitude for MH tests is kinda special. They include some valuable information about AV security that cannot be derived from other tests. The MH testers often try non-default settings combined with additional security layers. These tests include much more diversity compared to other tests. Furthermore, the testers usually understand well the protection features of tested AVs. Although the test results are not easy to interpret, I believe that the experienced testers can evaluate the AV protection without doing any statistics.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /><img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite130" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up&nbsp; &nbsp; (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 943342, member: 32260"] My attitude for MH tests is kinda special. They include some valuable information about AV security that cannot be derived from other tests. The MH testers often try non-default settings combined with additional security layers. These tests include much more diversity compared to other tests. Furthermore, the testers usually understand well the protection features of tested AVs. Although the test results are not easy to interpret, I believe that the experienced testers can evaluate the AV protection without doing any statistics.:)(y) [/QUOTE]

Verification