Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
General Apps
VM and Remote Access
Can’t decide if I like Windows VM or VMware Workstation better
Message
<blockquote data-quote="forgottenuser79643" data-source="post: 945888" data-attributes="member: 88069"><p>Though hyper-V and Windows Sandbox are great environments in my opinion (used it for many years). Enabling them can disable features from other software, since turning on the feature turns your OS to a hypervisor in itself. Some software such Ryzen Master to name one, don't like that and won't be able to start. If you use software that either can't run or can't stably run in a (virtualized) hypervisor environment I'd look into VirtualBox or one of the other competitors.</p><p></p><p>Especially since anything Windows, hyper-v included, are terribly documented many forget that it has the same native features as VirtualBox and VMware workstation. Sandbox should only be used as a testing area, and not as a VM testing environment. Sandbox only gives a clean sandbox environment that will delete itself upon closing. It's not a virtual machine environment, let alone customizable, like a real VM is.</p><p></p><p>Recently stepped over to VirtualBox, since some of the quality of life software I have come to use over the years aren't fully compatible with hyper-v enabled and won't run just a windows saying cant run with VBS enabled bla bla bla (Enabling Hyper-v turns your OS to a virtual hypervisor under the hood).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="forgottenuser79643, post: 945888, member: 88069"] Though hyper-V and Windows Sandbox are great environments in my opinion (used it for many years). Enabling them can disable features from other software, since turning on the feature turns your OS to a hypervisor in itself. Some software such Ryzen Master to name one, don't like that and won't be able to start. If you use software that either can't run or can't stably run in a (virtualized) hypervisor environment I'd look into VirtualBox or one of the other competitors. Especially since anything Windows, hyper-v included, are terribly documented many forget that it has the same native features as VirtualBox and VMware workstation. Sandbox should only be used as a testing area, and not as a VM testing environment. Sandbox only gives a clean sandbox environment that will delete itself upon closing. It's not a virtual machine environment, let alone customizable, like a real VM is. Recently stepped over to VirtualBox, since some of the quality of life software I have come to use over the years aren't fully compatible with hyper-v enabled and won't run just a windows saying cant run with VBS enabled bla bla bla (Enabling Hyper-v turns your OS to a virtual hypervisor under the hood). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top