do I need a separate anti virus?
So you are saying Malwarebytes 2.0 can be used as an anti virus without using an anti virus?
or r u saying Malwarebytes that's older than v2.0 can be used as an anti virus without using an anti virus
Actually, it still can be.The old Malwarebytes Anti malware could do the work alone without any av. This one cant
For our users who do prefer to continue using a traditional antivirus alongside Malwarebytes, by all means please continue to do so. Malwarebytes will always maintain compatibility with all major security software on the market, both free and paid.
In that instance I'd recommend Unchecky over Malwarebytes.If you have a problem with downloading PUPs then go ahead and replace your av with Malwarebytes.
Anti-exploit Premium was good. The free (now beta) version has always been absolutely pointless while EMET is still supported.They should make Malwarebytes anti exploit+anti adware imo. I'd love a product like that. Anti-Exploit+ anti-adware components(including adwcleaner and JRT) would be light and work properly. That or just make a cloud version of anti malware.
In that instance I'd recommend Unchecky over Malwarebytes.
Hi Guys,
Just wanted to know whether if I can use Malwarebytes 3.0 as my main anti virus?, or do I need a separate anti virus?
Kind Regards
Taga
I don't know whether to laugh or cry about this.Nope. We are taking over for a firm that used Malwarebytes Anti-Malware 3.0 as their only, and exclusive protection. ALL of the machines are infected and they'll be spending about 3K for us to clean them all up during onboarding.