Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Security Statistics and Reports
[CheckLab.pl] - Test of free antivirus
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Adrian Ścibor" data-source="post: 847427" data-attributes="member: 71496"><p>We cannot be responsible for what Microsoft do or do not do. If they don't provide protection for other browsers, they starts with a heavy cargo on his back.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The Avast engineer responsible for contacting with us has a different opinion. Avast company is satisfied with our testing methods. Even thanks to them we have made some corrections on the backend's script. I cannot agree with you by that.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>There is a some difference in detecting the same malware transmitted through different protocols. It may be strange, but it really is. Especially if malware is delivered to the system via drag-and-drop, i.e. via a process such as vmtools.exe. by users on many YouTube videos.</p><p></p><p>We will discuss internal about how we can improve testing methods. I will refer to SmartScreen too. Let's see the situation on back. Do you think it's good if SmartScreen will block everything? Then how to check the protection of an anti-malware product that will not have the opportunity to react on malware? SmartScreen is also known for False Positive. We do not prepare such of tests. So if we want to examine protection, e.g. Kaspersky, the SmartScreen technology must be turned off to check at what level Kaspersky can block malware. Otherwise SmartScreen will block probalby 100%? malware on Level 2 according to our methodology. But the users will not know the real effectiveness of Kaspersky. Therefore wat is your opinion on this case?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Adrian Ścibor, post: 847427, member: 71496"] We cannot be responsible for what Microsoft do or do not do. If they don't provide protection for other browsers, they starts with a heavy cargo on his back. The Avast engineer responsible for contacting with us has a different opinion. Avast company is satisfied with our testing methods. Even thanks to them we have made some corrections on the backend's script. I cannot agree with you by that. There is a some difference in detecting the same malware transmitted through different protocols. It may be strange, but it really is. Especially if malware is delivered to the system via drag-and-drop, i.e. via a process such as vmtools.exe. by users on many YouTube videos. We will discuss internal about how we can improve testing methods. I will refer to SmartScreen too. Let's see the situation on back. Do you think it's good if SmartScreen will block everything? Then how to check the protection of an anti-malware product that will not have the opportunity to react on malware? SmartScreen is also known for False Positive. We do not prepare such of tests. So if we want to examine protection, e.g. Kaspersky, the SmartScreen technology must be turned off to check at what level Kaspersky can block malware. Otherwise SmartScreen will block probalby 100%? malware on Level 2 according to our methodology. But the users will not know the real effectiveness of Kaspersky. Therefore wat is your opinion on this case? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top