Funny thing is, I feel Aurora is too tame. I like to take some risksI never use Canary. I was using Firefox Nightly (x64). It is very stable for home use. I am also using Firefox Aurora which is more stable than Nigthly. Nightly gets updates daily. Firefox Aurora gets updates each 2-3 days.
Only issue is I had, some extensions does not support these builds. You are good to go Aurora, I think. But remember, these browsers are testing purpose only.
So, are you saying Firefox Nightly is more stable than Canary? I've had a VERY bad experience with Aurora, pages would load too long and everything wouldn't work. However, Nightly didn't have this issue!They don't come without risks for being extremely buggy. Chrome Canary user for a few months now, problems I've faced from breaking websites, flash not working, no About page, X button not working, and to top it off multiple updates over a few days. And may make some extensions only partially operational.
Use at your own risk.
I never try to judge an unfinished product, it would be like trying to say which half painted house looks the best.
These test builds are for testing only and should not be used for normal browsing.
Enjoy!!![]()
Which versions did you test? New Firefox builds more agile than ever. They did some under the hood improvements.Funny thing is, I feel Aurora is too tame. I like to take some risks
So, are you saying Firefox Nightly is more stable than Canary? I've had a VERY bad experience with Aurora, pages would load too long and everything wouldn't work. However, Nightly didn't have this issue!![]()
It was in April, testing Firefox 30 a2Which versions did you test? New Firefox builds more agile than ever. They did some under the hood improvements.
Australis does not mean only interface.
Ok then. It is not so late. I did not face this kind of problemIt was in April, testing Firefox 30 a2