Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
CLOSED - Challenge VoodooShield (and Win a lifetime License!)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 65228" data-source="post: 697524"><p>Good to see I'm not the only one who thinks that VS is hardly known outside these walls. I had a run in with the developer not so long ago, didn't believe that in the real world VS is unheard of to the real average Joe... Must Thinks his company is as large as Symantec lol.</p><p></p><p></p><p>You're right and the developer should make some line of defense because they already have access to kernel-mode since they have an EV digital signature so by not adding enhanced self defence they are sort of not using their resources to the best of their ability I think, but at the same time I think macro's are flawed in itself and it is better to just not use Microsoft Office, or use it with macro's disabled in the first place if you want to be secure.</p><p></p><p>I doubt you'll find any macro in the wild which targets VS though. The malware authors I doubt have heard of VS</p><p></p><p>So with this taken into account, the developer probably doesn't care about doing self-defence and probably has more important things to focus on</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 65228, post: 697524"] Good to see I'm not the only one who thinks that VS is hardly known outside these walls. I had a run in with the developer not so long ago, didn't believe that in the real world VS is unheard of to the real average Joe... Must Thinks his company is as large as Symantec lol. You're right and the developer should make some line of defense because they already have access to kernel-mode since they have an EV digital signature so by not adding enhanced self defence they are sort of not using their resources to the best of their ability I think, but at the same time I think macro's are flawed in itself and it is better to just not use Microsoft Office, or use it with macro's disabled in the first place if you want to be secure. I doubt you'll find any macro in the wild which targets VS though. The malware authors I doubt have heard of VS So with this taken into account, the developer probably doesn't care about doing self-defence and probably has more important things to focus on [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top