@Yash Khan
Comodo Cloud AV - Autosandbox only - petya bypassed
Comodo Firewall - Proactive Configurations
Comodo Cloud AV - Autosandbox only - petya bypassed
Comodo Firewall - Proactive Configurations
Last edited:
Comodo Cloud AV - Autosandbox only - petya bypassed
- Thread starter Evjl's Rain
- Start date
It is advised to take all reviews with a grain of salt. In extreme cases some reviews use dramatization for entertainment purposes.
- Apr 6, 2016
- 440
Petya bypassed Comodo then, @Evjl's Rain you was testing in VM? or SD?
it's a VM with windows 7. I only use SD for my windows 10 host machine
My host machine uses GPT-UEFI drive so petya might not be able to do anything because petya only works on MBR-BIOS drive
- Apr 6, 2016
- 440
you think Petya is able to bypass SD and encrypt host machine? of cours i mean that MBR-BIOS
I don't know but it's super rare as someone explained. petya, I don't think it can
but hackers who really want to steal your info can
check if you are using GPT. If you do, don't worry about petya
- Nov 19, 2014
- 2,344
Interesting. So CCAV doesn't protect the mbr from an isolated application? This is indeed weird and sad.
Need to not read this forum in the mornings because it makes me sad seeing such results.
Need to not read this forum in the mornings because it makes me sad seeing such results.
Not at it's current state.
- Oct 22, 2016
- 409
Petya is terrifying
comodo firewall or CIS are the answer for that
they are better all the way including performance
if you are using GPT drive, don't worry about petya
- Nov 19, 2014
- 2,344
But that should make 0 difference because they ported the CIS sandbox module into CCAV a while back. So they might have messed permissions for anything run isolated because in practice the 2 modules are identical. Too lazy to find the changelog but you probably remember.comodo firewall or CIS are the answer for that
they are better all the way including performance
actually they are different according to comodo's FAQ
Cloud Antivirus | Comodo Free Proactive Protection Software
I also tested comodo firewall in proactive mode, I didn't change the restriction level, it blocked 100% including petya. I assume it's much better
- Nov 19, 2014
- 2,344
- Nov 19, 2014
- 2,344
I listen but i just don't trust them. If i ever use their software again it's only for the firewall and nothing else.again
1 more reason not to listen to what they say
wait, or perhaps CF would be bypassed by petya also? The last time I tested, I forgot to disable file rating completely. Maybe that's the reason why CF blocked it. I may do another test then
- Nov 19, 2014
- 2,344
Maybe, i don't know. Who knows what they did.
- Jul 3, 2015
- 8,153
the faq doesn't actually say that CCAV has the same sandbox settings as CFW "proactive" config. Maybe it has the same settings as firewall config, which is weak on the COM side. @cruelsister says that firewall config in comodo 10 is lacking in proper COM protection.
- Nov 19, 2014
- 2,344
It should not matter. They should protect the mbr, who the hell doesn't when we have so many ransomware that do that.
- Jul 3, 2015
- 8,153
CFW in firewall config actually relies at its default settings on HIPS, while autosandbox is disabled by default.
But your scathing criticism is richly deserved by CCAV...
hi, I posted a short video for comodo firewall
- Nov 19, 2014
- 2,344
I don't care on what it relies or how it does it. They just created a program apparently for sandbox only and the sandbox has the same capabilities as CIS from what they are advertising. So they should #####ing go to work and figure a way to at least stop the most common exploited methods.
This Comodo loops you need to jump are ridiculous and i am not going to take it easy on them or defend them. If they made a terrible program is not my fault.
Similar threads
