Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Comodo Cloud AV - Autosandbox only - petya bypassed
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AtlBo" data-source="post: 590689" data-attributes="member: 32547"><p>Comodo's products do seem to differ. Was using Dragon, but issues connecting to sites began to occur. I don't lay the fault at Comodo for this, but when I installed GC, I realized a serious improvement on the PC performance-wise. It's a decent i5 2400 PC, which benches very well for a standard business class computer, so differences can be difficult to discern. That was not the case this time. Maybe it was Comodo's default extensions or others, but disabling them didn't seem account for any of the difference in PC performance.</p><p></p><p>Dragon seems in retrospect a little bit like a slightly mis-timed automobile, at least in comparison to Chrome. Is Comodo's build for Blink/Chrome based any indication of across the board struggles within the company with regards to efficiency of design? I think maybe to be honest.</p><p></p><p>Comodo would benefit by paying a high priced developer with experience in gaming optimization. CF is fine, but it's possible to detect when a program can be more efficiently streamlined. In the rush to create products, the company seems to me to have left holes in some of their programs in this regard, especially. Best optimized apps I have experienced from Comodo...Comodo Programs Manager and Comodo Cleaning Essentials. Neither are full-time run-time.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AtlBo, post: 590689, member: 32547"] Comodo's products do seem to differ. Was using Dragon, but issues connecting to sites began to occur. I don't lay the fault at Comodo for this, but when I installed GC, I realized a serious improvement on the PC performance-wise. It's a decent i5 2400 PC, which benches very well for a standard business class computer, so differences can be difficult to discern. That was not the case this time. Maybe it was Comodo's default extensions or others, but disabling them didn't seem account for any of the difference in PC performance. Dragon seems in retrospect a little bit like a slightly mis-timed automobile, at least in comparison to Chrome. Is Comodo's build for Blink/Chrome based any indication of across the board struggles within the company with regards to efficiency of design? I think maybe to be honest. Comodo would benefit by paying a high priced developer with experience in gaming optimization. CF is fine, but it's possible to detect when a program can be more efficiently streamlined. In the rush to create products, the company seems to me to have left holes in some of their programs in this regard, especially. Best optimized apps I have experienced from Comodo...Comodo Programs Manager and Comodo Cleaning Essentials. Neither are full-time run-time. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top