Why? Just why? Comodo cloud AV will bring nothing to the table apart from on demand scanning, as CFW already has cloud lookup ability. And if you really want to use a "Comodo AV" then use Comodo Internet Security.What do you think?
I believe Comodo stated they are now compatible, that was about 2 months ago.
Anyone heard of Valkyrie? Not included in CFW.
I hope it will be in the future.
Now when network control for sandboxed files are included in CCAV, maybe you do not need CFW?
/W
Does it work now? When I tried CCAV this function never worked properly on my system.Anyone heard of Valkyrie? Not included in CFW.
I hope it will be in the future.
Now when network control for sandboxed files are included in CCAV, maybe you do not need CFW?
/W
Viruscope uses behavioural analysis for detection of unknown malware. Recognizers are files that contain sets of behaviours that Viruscope will look out for.I have heard of it, but how's it any different than VirusScope and recognizers?
That's a bug with HIPS rules (an really old one), and as with CS config HIPS in CFW will be disabled you have nothing to worry.I think that many here state they have issues with CFW and CIS....Settings vanish ETC.
Thus the interest in CCAV !
The video reviews of CCAV as of late seem to all be very favorable.
That's a bug with HIPS rules (an really old one), and as with CS config HIPS in CFW will be disabled you have nothing to worry.
Does it work now? When I tried CCAV this function never worked properly on my system.
Thanks for answer for me it is important because I am thinking of giving a second opportunityIt works now at least, usually you get a verdict over night or less.
Some files, (safe files) seem to go a lot slower to get a verdict.
I am by no means happy with it until it have the same response time as Avast CyberCapture for example.
Umesh makes it move in the right direction now anyway.
/W