Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Comodo
Comodo Firewall component being ignored
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Decopi" data-source="post: 1036488" data-attributes="member: 67091"><p>Please, allow me some clarifications:</p><p></p><p>1. I love [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER] and I think she shared and she still shares amazing experiences (not just related to Comodo). However, I don't need to trust [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER] in order to enjoy [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER].</p><p>The forbidden word here is "TRUST"... users always must have critical thinking.</p><p>[USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER] is an anonymous character, no one knows her personally, her work is subjective, no one controls her tests, no one really knows if the information shared by [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER] is true or false. [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER] never has been objectively validated or confirmed as a security software expert or as a Comodo expert. By the way, not even Comodo has ever made any official acknowledgment of [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER], validating [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER]'s tests or information.</p><p>In this context, the allegation that [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER] is an expert, It is just a belief with no basis in reality, just based on "trust"... and remember, "trust" is a subjective matter.</p><p>People are free to share opinions, beliefs and their "trusts"... as long as they always remember the difference between "subjective" VS "objective".</p><p></p><p>2. I do love Comodo, and I used @cruelCF for a long time. When Comodo stopped updates, upgrades, and bugs weren't fixed... I stopped to use Comodo.</p><p>It's common sense, the fact I emotionally love [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER] and Comodo... it doesn't necessarily means I need to be a fanatic or a fanboy.</p><p>Yeah, no doubt, I'll test Comodo again, and I'll love to have @cruelCF again, but only after updates/upgrades.</p><p></p><p>Final words:</p><p>1. With all due respect, "experts" normally are not anonymous characters found in the normal open web posting free software tests. In real world, "experts" normally are known people working at big companies, or they are out-off-the-grid (anonymous but posting in the darkweb etc).</p><p>2. If Comodo containment were the panacea for security, all security software would have already incorporated (long time ago) this layer into their own software. The wheel is not invented... it is copied.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Decopi, post: 1036488, member: 67091"] Please, allow me some clarifications: 1. I love [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER] and I think she shared and she still shares amazing experiences (not just related to Comodo). However, I don't need to trust [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER] in order to enjoy [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER]. The forbidden word here is "TRUST"... users always must have critical thinking. [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER] is an anonymous character, no one knows her personally, her work is subjective, no one controls her tests, no one really knows if the information shared by [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER] is true or false. [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER] never has been objectively validated or confirmed as a security software expert or as a Comodo expert. By the way, not even Comodo has ever made any official acknowledgment of [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER], validating [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER]'s tests or information. In this context, the allegation that [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER] is an expert, It is just a belief with no basis in reality, just based on "trust"... and remember, "trust" is a subjective matter. People are free to share opinions, beliefs and their "trusts"... as long as they always remember the difference between "subjective" VS "objective". 2. I do love Comodo, and I used @cruelCF for a long time. When Comodo stopped updates, upgrades, and bugs weren't fixed... I stopped to use Comodo. It's common sense, the fact I emotionally love [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER] and Comodo... it doesn't necessarily means I need to be a fanatic or a fanboy. Yeah, no doubt, I'll test Comodo again, and I'll love to have @cruelCF again, but only after updates/upgrades. Final words: 1. With all due respect, "experts" normally are not anonymous characters found in the normal open web posting free software tests. In real world, "experts" normally are known people working at big companies, or they are out-off-the-grid (anonymous but posting in the darkweb etc). 2. If Comodo containment were the panacea for security, all security software would have already incorporated (long time ago) this layer into their own software. The wheel is not invented... it is copied. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top