Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Comodo Firewall Plays with RATs
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 97327" data-source="post: 1024320"><p>HTA is useless for home users. Just cripple mshta.exe by enabling all protections for it in Exploit Protection of Microsoft Defender (exploit protection works even when you use a different AV)</p><p></p><p>[SPOILER="mshta.exe easy fix"]</p><p>[ATTACH=full]272848[/ATTACH]</p><p>[/SPOILER]</p><p></p><p></p><p>David Xanatos claims Sandboxie protection is much stronger than Comodo's virtualization. I read at Wilders that the lowered SBIE protection should be as strong as Comodo FW. Now I am not a Sandboxie user nor Comodo user anymore and I am not testing any of them with malware, so I have no opinion on this (a respected software developer's word against a respected software tester's word), so maybe some Sandboxie users can chime in to explain this contradiction in claims.</p><p></p><p>Note: the automatic virtualization of Comodo is a great advantage over Sandboxie IMO, no matter what the ins and outs of the protection mechanisms are (kernel vs user).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 97327, post: 1024320"] HTA is useless for home users. Just cripple mshta.exe by enabling all protections for it in Exploit Protection of Microsoft Defender (exploit protection works even when you use a different AV) [SPOILER="mshta.exe easy fix"] [ATTACH type="full"]272848[/ATTACH] [/SPOILER] David Xanatos claims Sandboxie protection is much stronger than Comodo's virtualization. I read at Wilders that the lowered SBIE protection should be as strong as Comodo FW. Now I am not a Sandboxie user nor Comodo user anymore and I am not testing any of them with malware, so I have no opinion on this (a respected software developer's word against a respected software tester's word), so maybe some Sandboxie users can chime in to explain this contradiction in claims. Note: the automatic virtualization of Comodo is a great advantage over Sandboxie IMO, no matter what the ins and outs of the protection mechanisms are (kernel vs user). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top