Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Comodo
Comodo Internet Security 2024 Beta is now available
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Decopi" data-source="post: 1054187" data-attributes="member: 67091"><p>Please, allow me to disagree here.</p><p></p><p>Common sense says that official info should be searched from official sources.</p><p>So, talking about product "X" on website "Y" without reading website "X"... could be wrong or at least incomplete.</p><p></p><p>And regarding the "fake Comodo employee", it is not a proof against the mentioned principle above, because Comodo employees continue to participate at Comodo forum, and only there we have official and technical answers. Even your Melihness is speaking there! So, liking or hating product "X", between website "Y" and "X", if the official info and the holy highest priest (CEO) are responding on website "X", then the logical thing to do is to think always first on reading website "X".</p><p></p><p>Last but not least, even if someone rejects website "X" because they have a "fake employee", I still wonder what's worse:</p><p>1. A "fake employee" at the official forum, where I still have official employees, official info, and CEO responses?</p><p>OR</p><p>2. An exchange of subjective opinions between fanboys/girls, or between unofficial amateurs at a third-party website?</p><p></p><p>It's just a rhetorical question.</p><p>The answer is personal, each one is free to choose the way to search for info and the way to feed premises and conclusions.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Decopi, post: 1054187, member: 67091"] Please, allow me to disagree here. Common sense says that official info should be searched from official sources. So, talking about product "X" on website "Y" without reading website "X"... could be wrong or at least incomplete. And regarding the "fake Comodo employee", it is not a proof against the mentioned principle above, because Comodo employees continue to participate at Comodo forum, and only there we have official and technical answers. Even your Melihness is speaking there! So, liking or hating product "X", between website "Y" and "X", if the official info and the holy highest priest (CEO) are responding on website "X", then the logical thing to do is to think always first on reading website "X". Last but not least, even if someone rejects website "X" because they have a "fake employee", I still wonder what's worse: 1. A "fake employee" at the official forum, where I still have official employees, official info, and CEO responses? OR 2. An exchange of subjective opinions between fanboys/girls, or between unofficial amateurs at a third-party website? It's just a rhetorical question. The answer is personal, each one is free to choose the way to search for info and the way to feed premises and conclusions. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top