Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
COMODO Internet Security 2024 BETA
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 97327" data-source="post: 1053895"><p>Dear MT-members</p><p></p><p> I think we all agree on the fact that Comodo hast a great Firewall with containment technology, but the antivirus is buggy and its HIPS forgets rules. As a non-Comodo user I am interested in its Firewall plus containment technology. It is possible to install the FW separately, so when you don't like the AV-module, don't select it. The added value over a HIPS is questionable when you also apply containment through sandboxing. It is possible to disable the HIPS, so forget that module also.</p><p></p><p>Because Comodo has a fanatic army of promotors and an equally outspoken army of disappointed users and critics, let's leave that behind and focus the discussion on Comodo's stronghold: the Firewall module and its sandbox containment. We all know the AV is as fragile as a man of glass and the HIPS suffers from dementia, but their FW+sandbox is a great kick-ass component (which is soon officially compatible with mainstream tech). I hope [USER=92939]@Shadowra[/USER] can repeat his test when the final comes out with ONLY the FW + Sandbox installed (e.g.using Microsoft Defender on default as accompanying AV).</p><p></p><p>Don't want to offend engaged members on either side of the table. Please focus on the FW+sandbox of Comodo. Thanks.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 97327, post: 1053895"] Dear MT-members I think we all agree on the fact that Comodo hast a great Firewall with containment technology, but the antivirus is buggy and its HIPS forgets rules. As a non-Comodo user I am interested in its Firewall plus containment technology. It is possible to install the FW separately, so when you don't like the AV-module, don't select it. The added value over a HIPS is questionable when you also apply containment through sandboxing. It is possible to disable the HIPS, so forget that module also. Because Comodo has a fanatic army of promotors and an equally outspoken army of disappointed users and critics, let's leave that behind and focus the discussion on Comodo's stronghold: the Firewall module and its sandbox containment. We all know the AV is as fragile as a man of glass and the HIPS suffers from dementia, but their FW+sandbox is a great kick-ass component (which is soon officially compatible with mainstream tech). I hope [USER=92939]@Shadowra[/USER] can repeat his test when the final comes out with ONLY the FW + Sandbox installed (e.g.using Microsoft Defender on default as accompanying AV). Don't want to offend engaged members on either side of the table. Please focus on the FW+sandbox of Comodo. Thanks. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top