Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Decopi" data-source="post: 1054001" data-attributes="member: 67091">With regards to the Firewall, please, if you allow me, also I would add Windows Firewall (WF) as an excellent firewall, even more compatible and robust than Comodo Firewall (CF). Windows OS doesn&#039;t need an external third-party Firewall.The only issues with WF are its &quot;not friendly&quot; settings. Average-Joe can&#039;t customize WF. And advanced-users need to invest time to do that. Compared to WF, other external third-party firewall only add &quot;friendly settings&quot; (but they don&#039;t really add more protection).Without Containment, CF itself as a module, doesn&#039;t add more protection than customized WF already does.WF is a powerful tool, yeah, takes time to setup it, but here at MalwareTips and in the web is possible to find amazing WF tutorials.In the last 30 years, the consumer market never massively adopted any third-party firewall, and there is a good reason for that.That leaves Containment as the sole useful module in Comodo.Therefore, if Comodo launches a simple software only for Containment, it would be great. Nothing else at Comodo is worth it.Unfortunately, as many advanced users reported here at MalwareTips, also at Comodo Forum, and as [USER=92939]@Shadowra[/USER] mentioned (attached below)... in the near past Comodo Containment was buggy.I tested new beta, and Containment remains the same, with some unfixed bugs.I&#039;m in contact with several comodo-advanced-users, and they also confirm some Containment bugs.After new Beta, as usual, the Comodo Forum is starting to accumulate a long list of different kind of bugs. It&#039;s premature to make conclusions, but at first sight, it seems new Comodo Beta is old Comodo just with new GUI, no new features, no new core improvements, few fixed bugs, but still containing lot of the same unfixed old bugs.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Decopi, post: 1054001, member: 67091"] With regards to the Firewall, please, if you allow me, also I would add Windows Firewall (WF) as an excellent firewall, even more compatible and robust than Comodo Firewall (CF). Windows OS doesn't need an external third-party Firewall. The only issues with WF are its "not friendly" settings. Average-Joe can't customize WF. And advanced-users need to invest time to do that. Compared to WF, other external third-party firewall only add "friendly settings" (but they don't really add more protection). Without Containment, CF itself as a module, doesn't add more protection than customized WF already does. WF is a powerful tool, yeah, takes time to setup it, but here at MalwareTips and in the web is possible to find amazing WF tutorials. In the last 30 years, the consumer market never massively adopted any third-party firewall, and there is a good reason for that. That leaves Containment as the sole useful module in Comodo. Therefore, if Comodo launches a simple software only for Containment, it would be great. Nothing else at Comodo is worth it. Unfortunately, as many advanced users reported here at MalwareTips, also at Comodo Forum, and as [USER=92939]@Shadowra[/USER] mentioned (attached below)... in the near past Comodo Containment was buggy. I tested new beta, and Containment remains the same, with some unfixed bugs. I'm in contact with several comodo-advanced-users, and they also confirm some Containment bugs. After new Beta, as usual, the Comodo Forum is starting to accumulate a long list of different kind of bugs. It's premature to make conclusions, but at first sight, it seems new Comodo Beta is old Comodo just with new GUI, no new features, no new core improvements, few fixed bugs, but still containing lot of the same unfixed old bugs. [/QUOTE]

Verification