Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="bazang" data-source="post: 1107488" data-attributes="member: 114717">Yeah? So what? It is not different than any other security software that misses ransomware. Those other security software miss it way more often than Comodo.All the videos showing bypasses would be meaningful if 1) the Comodo products had revenue that paid for full-time dedicated development teams and 2) anybody was stating &quot;Comodo is unbeatable&quot; (which there is nobody saying that).The only credible thing to do is show how Comodo performs against every other security software using many hundreds of samples. If it prevents infection at a greater rate, then it is protecting better than those that do worse. If it does not prevent infection at a greater rate, then it is protecting worse than those that do better.&quot;One-off&quot; POC and similar videos of Comodo failing to do this or that apply only to the specific POC or malware used. They should not be used to extrapolate or generalize about Comodo - which I think there is a big push here by some that have an agenda against Comodo.Comodo is software. Software has problems. Comodo software is further problematic because it has no revenue and therefore no dedicated development team.A few POCs and an undetected ransomware are not very enlightening. Nobody ever expects any software to be 100% bullet proof. Nobody here at MT or elsewhere has ever said that Comodo is unbeatable or not free of weaknesses &amp; vulnerabilities.But the videos are great click-bait.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="bazang, post: 1107488, member: 114717"] Yeah? So what? It is not different than any other security software that misses ransomware. Those other security software miss it way more often than Comodo. All the videos showing bypasses would be meaningful if 1) the Comodo products had revenue that paid for full-time dedicated development teams and 2) anybody was stating "Comodo is unbeatable" (which there is nobody saying that). The only credible thing to do is show how Comodo performs against every other security software using many hundreds of samples. If it prevents infection at a greater rate, then it is protecting better than those that do worse. If it does not prevent infection at a greater rate, then it is protecting worse than those that do better. "One-off" POC and similar videos of Comodo failing to do this or that apply only to the specific POC or malware used. They should not be used to extrapolate or generalize about Comodo - which I think there is a big push here by some that have an agenda against Comodo. Comodo is software. Software has problems. Comodo software is further problematic because it has no revenue and therefore no dedicated development team. A few POCs and an undetected ransomware are not very enlightening. Nobody ever expects any software to be 100% bullet proof. Nobody here at MT or elsewhere has ever said that Comodo is unbeatable or not free of weaknesses & vulnerabilities. But the videos are great click-bait. [/QUOTE]

Verification