Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Comodo
Comodo Internet Security 2025 does not contain RANSOMWARE (bypass, infection and lost of files)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Windroter" data-source="post: 1107639" data-attributes="member: 111093"><p>hello friends</p><p>I am sorry that my language is NOT good</p><p>Let's accept that testing in real conditions is different from testing with the conditions that we know about the executable file</p><p>So, Sweety like Comodo is not useful at all and the reason is to maneuver on Sandbox and HIPS.</p><p>These two features are not useful at all because when we download a file and it does not have a digital signature, there is no reason for it to be malicious, and now these two features make the user confused and make mistakes.</p><p>Comodo is a fleeting pleasure and wants to hide all its problems behind sandbox and HIPS.</p><p>Comodo joined the memories in version 5. Unfortunately, Comodo's programming team hires a design and graphics team instead of security solutions and improving its software problems.</p><p>Years ago, in a Persian language forum, we fell in love with the two features of Sandbox and HIPS, and we used to test with Zero day malware and enjoy it, but with the passage of time, we realized that the world of real testing and real conditions does not pass with Allow and block files.</p><p>" Beware of fleeting emotions "</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Windroter, post: 1107639, member: 111093"] hello friends I am sorry that my language is NOT good Let's accept that testing in real conditions is different from testing with the conditions that we know about the executable file So, Sweety like Comodo is not useful at all and the reason is to maneuver on Sandbox and HIPS. These two features are not useful at all because when we download a file and it does not have a digital signature, there is no reason for it to be malicious, and now these two features make the user confused and make mistakes. Comodo is a fleeting pleasure and wants to hide all its problems behind sandbox and HIPS. Comodo joined the memories in version 5. Unfortunately, Comodo's programming team hires a design and graphics team instead of security solutions and improving its software problems. Years ago, in a Persian language forum, we fell in love with the two features of Sandbox and HIPS, and we used to test with Zero day malware and enjoy it, but with the passage of time, we realized that the world of real testing and real conditions does not pass with Allow and block files. " Beware of fleeting emotions " [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
