Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 1112077" data-attributes="member: 32260">Here is a post on the Wilders Security forum related to this thread:[URL unfurl=&quot;false&quot;]https://www.wilderssecurity.com/threads/comodo-internet-security-2025-beta-final-infos-thread.453843/page-3#post-3218351[/URL]I must partially agree with [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER]. The readers might wrongly understand the interesting POCs and discussions here because of very different viewpoints. I saw a similar situation when reading interesting threads about bypassing Microsoft Defender and other AVs. Whenever the bypass was presented, some people were convinced that AV was not enough, and willing to change it to another one. Such a reaction is natural but mainly irrational. Let&#039;s not be fooled by emotions.The POCs and bypasses have a much smaller impact on security than hundreds of new malware variants, that bypass AVs each day due to the limitations of Machine Learning.Currently, the Malware-As-A-Service is sufficiently prevalent and malware is often prepared to bypass the protection of most AVs.<ol>
<li data-xf-list-type="ol">People who use Comodo should not be surprised that it can be bypassed. Auto-containment is not a perfect solution.</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ol">Users should not think that other AVs can protect better because someone presented some of Comodo&#039;s bypasses or POCs.</li>
</ol>It is better to see an AV like a human immune system. It is not intended to protect any cell in the body but to prevent infecting many cells.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 1112077, member: 32260"] Here is a post on the Wilders Security forum related to this thread: [URL unfurl="false"]https://www.wilderssecurity.com/threads/comodo-internet-security-2025-beta-final-infos-thread.453843/page-3#post-3218351[/URL] I must partially agree with [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER]. The readers might wrongly understand the interesting POCs and discussions here because of very different viewpoints. I saw a similar situation when reading interesting threads about bypassing Microsoft Defender and other AVs. Whenever the bypass was presented, some people were convinced that AV was not enough, and willing to change it to another one. Such a reaction is natural but mainly irrational. Let's not be fooled by emotions. The POCs and bypasses have a much smaller impact on security than hundreds of new malware variants, that bypass AVs each day due to the limitations of Machine Learning. [B][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]Currently, the Malware-As-A-Service is sufficiently prevalent and malware is often prepared to bypass the protection of most AVs.[/COLOR][/B] [LIST=1] [*]People who use Comodo should not be surprised that it can be bypassed. Auto-containment is not a perfect solution. [*]Users should not think that other AVs can protect better because someone presented some of Comodo's bypasses or POCs. [/LIST] It is better to see an AV like a human immune system. It is not intended to protect any cell in the body but to prevent infecting many cells. [/QUOTE]

Verification