Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Comodo
Comodo Internet Security 2025 does not contain RANSOMWARE (bypass, infection and lost of files)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 1116469" data-attributes="member: 32260"><p>Normally, I would say that this particular malware is nothing unusual or dangerous because it is a kind of POC (based on an in-the-wild sample). Unfortunately, my experience with Comodo's detection of DLLs is very pessimistic, especially for DLLs uploaded to Malware Bazaar. To be honest, Comodo can contain many in-the-wild attacks with DLLs (mainly via Script Analysis). The problem can arise when the attack uses a Trusted and benign EXE file (like in the video) that loads a malicious DLL.</p><p></p><p>The problem with shortcuts mentioned in the video is mainly solved by Comodo via Auto-containment and Script Analysis. So, in this case, @cruelsiter was right. Comodo does not block shortcuts, but it can efficiently contain the execution of processes triggered via shortcuts. The problem is mainly when the shortcut triggers a Trusted and benign file (not restricted by Script Analysis) that loads a malicious DLL. Such attacks were rarely reported in the wild.</p><p></p><p>In my opinion, the problem presented in the video is a potential weak point of Comodo. However, there are no reports that this attack vector was intentionally used in the wild against the Comodo/Xcitium customers. As [USER=109212]@vitao[/USER] mentioned in the video, the current protection of Comodo is one of the best. Any top AV has some weaknesses.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 1116469, member: 32260"] Normally, I would say that this particular malware is nothing unusual or dangerous because it is a kind of POC (based on an in-the-wild sample). Unfortunately, my experience with Comodo's detection of DLLs is very pessimistic, especially for DLLs uploaded to Malware Bazaar. To be honest, Comodo can contain many in-the-wild attacks with DLLs (mainly via Script Analysis). The problem can arise when the attack uses a Trusted and benign EXE file (like in the video) that loads a malicious DLL. The problem with shortcuts mentioned in the video is mainly solved by Comodo via Auto-containment and Script Analysis. So, in this case, @cruelsiter was right. Comodo does not block shortcuts, but it can efficiently contain the execution of processes triggered via shortcuts. The problem is mainly when the shortcut triggers a Trusted and benign file (not restricted by Script Analysis) that loads a malicious DLL. Such attacks were rarely reported in the wild. In my opinion, the problem presented in the video is a potential weak point of Comodo. However, there are no reports that this attack vector was intentionally used in the wild against the Comodo/Xcitium customers. As [USER=109212]@vitao[/USER] mentioned in the video, the current protection of Comodo is one of the best. Any top AV has some weaknesses. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top