Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Comodo
Comodo Internet Security 2025 does not contain RANSOMWARE (bypass, infection and lost of files)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Vitali Ortzi" data-source="post: 1116499" data-attributes="member: 57714"><p>Comodo can't be trusted alone because of such cases but thankfully it's pretty light and can complement your av as a form of reputation layer (with some flaws of abusing trusted processes like in this case)</p><p></p><p>Smart app control , smartscreen is the same it's basically a layer to complement a lot to the security of a system blocking majority of malware at that layer</p><p></p><p>So till smart app control has less false positives I'm staying with comodo for that layer instead</p><p></p><p>Usually comodo is advised as a uac replacement but personally I think that's wrong it doesn't replace elevation on the trusted processes as shown by the ransomware using trusted executables</p><p></p><p>But it can definitely be used to replace smart app control, smart screen for those that prefer comodo but I would at least keep a browser level smart screen like the microsoft defender extension it catches usually more pishing pages then google and cam complement the Google safe browsing at stopping more malware at the first layer</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Vitali Ortzi, post: 1116499, member: 57714"] Comodo can't be trusted alone because of such cases but thankfully it's pretty light and can complement your av as a form of reputation layer (with some flaws of abusing trusted processes like in this case) Smart app control , smartscreen is the same it's basically a layer to complement a lot to the security of a system blocking majority of malware at that layer So till smart app control has less false positives I'm staying with comodo for that layer instead Usually comodo is advised as a uac replacement but personally I think that's wrong it doesn't replace elevation on the trusted processes as shown by the ransomware using trusted executables But it can definitely be used to replace smart app control, smart screen for those that prefer comodo but I would at least keep a browser level smart screen like the microsoft defender extension it catches usually more pishing pages then google and cam complement the Google safe browsing at stopping more malware at the first layer [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top