Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Sephirothnight" data-source="post: 1117360" data-attributes="member: 75117">Good morning,It is not a novelty at Comodo, it&#039;s been several years that they categorically refuse to publish or even in private, the &quot;faults&quot;, bugs and others on their forum, they banned a former administrator of their own forum to have &quot;Disclosed&quot; the closure of CIS with a line of code, it did not please Melih: it was banished. It was done privately at the start. In short, too bad it is clearly not a positive path, it is essential to evolve and advance security, but at this stage ... Comodo remains good, I use it too but I admit that I do not understand all these Stories that can only improve their product and that they censor without looking further. I wonder if a possible replacement of Comodo that I have been using since this beginning will not take place because even if I use it, I do not appreciate their methods and way to make for the feedback that users make. Too bad for me and too bad for them.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Sephirothnight, post: 1117360, member: 75117"] Good morning, It is not a novelty at Comodo, it's been several years that they categorically refuse to publish or even in private, the "faults", bugs and others on their forum, they banned a former administrator of their own forum to have "Disclosed" the closure of CIS with a line of code, it did not please Melih: it was banished. It was done privately at the start. In short, too bad it is clearly not a positive path, it is essential to evolve and advance security, but at this stage ... Comodo remains good, I use it too but I admit that I do not understand all these Stories that can only improve their product and that they censor without looking further. I wonder if a possible replacement of Comodo that I have been using since this beginning will not take place because even if I use it, I do not appreciate their methods and way to make for the feedback that users make. Too bad for me and too bad for them. [/QUOTE]

Verification