Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Comodo
Comodo Internet Security 2025 does not contain RANSOMWARE (bypass, infection and lost of files)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bazang" data-source="post: 1119819" data-attributes="member: 114717"><p>[USER=109212]@vitao[/USER] 's video clearly shows what he is stating is fact. There is no need for you to get upset. The girl has difficulties accepting reality for what it is sometimes. She can be very defensive about her one and only true love - Comodo. There's definitely a fixation or perhaps fetish with Comodo in her relationship with it.</p><p></p><p>Everything ever made by Comodo has always been a dumpster fire because the products have no adequate revenue to support their continued development and maintenance. There is no dedicated development team for any of the Comodo software products. Comodo developers are quickly cycled from one project to another, one fire to another fire. The work environment is chaos, inconsistent, and that type of culture generally produces undesired, lower quality product. Many people struggle to work at Comodo. There is high employee turnover.</p><p> </p><p>The Comodo way is a cycle of user complaints with long online arguments amongst fanbois and fangirlz and the complainers. That combined with the Comodo forum banning of reporters of bugs, bypasses and other problems because Melih does not want those reports made public. Only after very consistent, long, drawn-out criticisms and demonstrations of fact are things ever fixed.</p><p></p><p>I thought CAV was going to be a winner but it turned out to have high operational expenses and Melih just did not want to pay any more of his own personal money into that project. Immediately, RIP CAV. The same as a long, long list of Melih's software pet projects.</p><p></p><p>This is what you get from a rich software publisher who has a life-long ideological dispute with the AV industry and fights for his ideology with a free software handout.</p><p></p><p>Comodo is Melih's ideological experiment and it will never be any better than it is right now. If elite pentesters that earn millions of Euros per year were set upon CIS, CFW, and Xcitium, they would annihilate it. They don't do it because it is a waste of their very valuable time. Melih would never hire them to pentest his product, not even if his childrens' lives depended upon it. Do you think Melih would pay out 1,000,000 Euros for proven remote code execution vulns because of exploits of Comodo? No. He would not. As is his usual fashion he either ignores reports or dismisses them as not being realistic.</p><p></p><p>Comodo could be truly great, but it would require a entire re-code. That takes a significant amount of money that Melih has always communicated in his own way that he not willing to spend that kind of money on the software.</p><p></p><p>With Comodo, you accept it for all its problems, make the best of what works, do not use what does not work, and put a lot of effort into understanding how to make the most of its features and settings, while also learning to control frustrations about bugs and other issues. That is the Comodo experience. Some people are capable of dealing with it, others are not.</p><p></p><p>It is difficult to understand how people think that continuous complaining is ever going to motivate Melih to make Comodo a refined product. He has stated for decades that he will not do that because he thinks it is good enough given the amount of his own pocket money that he puts into it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bazang, post: 1119819, member: 114717"] [USER=109212]@vitao[/USER] 's video clearly shows what he is stating is fact. There is no need for you to get upset. The girl has difficulties accepting reality for what it is sometimes. She can be very defensive about her one and only true love - Comodo. There's definitely a fixation or perhaps fetish with Comodo in her relationship with it. Everything ever made by Comodo has always been a dumpster fire because the products have no adequate revenue to support their continued development and maintenance. There is no dedicated development team for any of the Comodo software products. Comodo developers are quickly cycled from one project to another, one fire to another fire. The work environment is chaos, inconsistent, and that type of culture generally produces undesired, lower quality product. Many people struggle to work at Comodo. There is high employee turnover. The Comodo way is a cycle of user complaints with long online arguments amongst fanbois and fangirlz and the complainers. That combined with the Comodo forum banning of reporters of bugs, bypasses and other problems because Melih does not want those reports made public. Only after very consistent, long, drawn-out criticisms and demonstrations of fact are things ever fixed. I thought CAV was going to be a winner but it turned out to have high operational expenses and Melih just did not want to pay any more of his own personal money into that project. Immediately, RIP CAV. The same as a long, long list of Melih's software pet projects. This is what you get from a rich software publisher who has a life-long ideological dispute with the AV industry and fights for his ideology with a free software handout. Comodo is Melih's ideological experiment and it will never be any better than it is right now. If elite pentesters that earn millions of Euros per year were set upon CIS, CFW, and Xcitium, they would annihilate it. They don't do it because it is a waste of their very valuable time. Melih would never hire them to pentest his product, not even if his childrens' lives depended upon it. Do you think Melih would pay out 1,000,000 Euros for proven remote code execution vulns because of exploits of Comodo? No. He would not. As is his usual fashion he either ignores reports or dismisses them as not being realistic. Comodo could be truly great, but it would require a entire re-code. That takes a significant amount of money that Melih has always communicated in his own way that he not willing to spend that kind of money on the software. With Comodo, you accept it for all its problems, make the best of what works, do not use what does not work, and put a lot of effort into understanding how to make the most of its features and settings, while also learning to control frustrations about bugs and other issues. That is the Comodo experience. Some people are capable of dealing with it, others are not. It is difficult to understand how people think that continuous complaining is ever going to motivate Melih to make Comodo a refined product. He has stated for decades that he will not do that because he thinks it is good enough given the amount of his own pocket money that he puts into it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
