Solved Computer needs to be checked for consistancy.. should I be worried?

[KelvinW4]

I have never had such a big problem when I check my disk. Should I be worried?
Here is the log:
Checking file system on C:
The type of the file system is NTFS.


One of your disks needs to be checked for consistency. You
may cancel the disk check, but it is strongly recommended
that you continue.
Windows will now check the disk.

CHKDSK is verifying files (stage 1 of 3)...
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x440d16 for possibly 0x4 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x188b2 is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 100530.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x4492d6 for possibly 0x1 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x188b3 is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 100531.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x415e62 for possibly 0x9 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x195eb is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103915.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x448b47 for possibly 0x1 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x195ec is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103916.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x415e59 for possibly 0x9 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x195ed is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103917.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x448b46 for possibly 0x1 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x195ee is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103918.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x415e32 for possibly 0x9 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x195ef is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103919.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x448b45 for possibly 0x1 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x195f0 is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103920.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x415e29 for possibly 0x9 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x195f1 is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103921.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x448b44 for possibly 0x1 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x195f2 is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103922.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x415e09 for possibly 0x9 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x195f3 is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103923.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x448b43 for possibly 0x1 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x195f4 is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103924.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x415df2 for possibly 0x9 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x195f5 is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103925.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x448b42 for possibly 0x1 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x195f6 is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103926.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x415de9 for possibly 0x9 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x195f7 is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103927.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x448b41 for possibly 0x1 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x195f8 is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103928.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x415dd0 for possibly 0x9 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x195f9 is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103929.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x448b40 for possibly 0x1 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x195fa is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103930.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x415d53 for possibly 0x9 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x195fb is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103931.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x448b3f for possibly 0x1 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x195fc is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103932.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x415b82 for possibly 0x9 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x195fd is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103933.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x448b3e for possibly 0x1 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x195fe is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103934.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x415b79 for possibly 0x9 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x195ff is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103935.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x448b3d for possibly 0x1 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x19600 is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103936.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x415b6d for possibly 0x9 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x19601 is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103937.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x448b3c for possibly 0x1 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x19602 is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103938.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x415909 for possibly 0x9 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x19603 is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103939.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x448b3b for possibly 0x1 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x19604 is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103940.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x4158f9 for possibly 0x9 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x19605 is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103941.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x448b3a for possibly 0x1 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x19606 is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103942.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x4158e8 for possibly 0x9 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x19607 is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103943.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x448b39 for possibly 0x1 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x19608 is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103944.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x4158df for possibly 0x9 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x19609 is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103945.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x448b38 for possibly 0x1 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x1960a is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103946.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x4158d6 for possibly 0x9 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x1960b is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103947.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x448b37 for possibly 0x1 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x1960c is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103948.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x448b36 for possibly 0x1 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x1960e is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103950.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x415549 for possibly 0x9 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x1960f is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103951.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x448b35 for possibly 0x1 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x19610 is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103952.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x415534 for possibly 0x9 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x19611 is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103953.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x448b34 for possibly 0x1 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x19612 is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103954.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x44085b for possibly 0x6 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x19613 is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103955.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x448b33 for possibly 0x1 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x19614 is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103956.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x41552b for possibly 0x9 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x19615 is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103957.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x448b32 for possibly 0x1 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x19616 is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103958.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x415522 for possibly 0x9 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x19617 is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103959.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x448b31 for possibly 0x1 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x19618 is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103960.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x415519 for possibly 0x9 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x19619 is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103961.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x448b30 for possibly 0x1 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x1961a is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103962.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x4154fe for possibly 0x9 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x1961b is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103963.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x448b2f for possibly 0x1 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x1961c is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103964.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x4154f5 for possibly 0x9 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x1961d is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103965.
Attribute record of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1 is cross linked
starting at 0x448b2e for possibly 0x1 clusters.
Some clusters occupied by attribute of type 0x80 and instance tag 0x1
in file 0x1961e is already in use.
Deleting corrupt attribute record (128, "")
from file record segment 103966.

there seems to be some more earlier but it did not fit :l

 

[McLovin]

Could be because you are not shutting Windows down properly or something to do with the hard drive.

 

[KelvinW4]

Could be because you are not shutting Windows down properly or something to do with the hard drive.

I always close my computer properly every time, unless I am forced. This never happened before though.... It still runs quite nice right now but just to be on the safe side I posted here.

 

[Spirit]

Its not a big deal just make a disk check and after that restart computer and see if its ask to make disk check again,if not there is nothing to worry and if yes than report here again

 

[MrXidus]

CHKDSK is a good way to check for corrupt clusters and files on your main HDD. If it finds issues it will attempt to fix them.

One way to avoid the issues in the first place is to defrag your HDD. This can be done with the built in Windows Defragmenter or a third party tool such as Auslogics Disk Defrag.

Bottom line, You have nothing to worry about unless you suddenly get a blue screens of death.

Let CHKDSK do its job.

Thanks.

 

[malbky]

Defragmentation is pretty useless for NTFS system. I would recommend doing this
1) Open Command Prompt with admin rights
2) Type 'chkdsk /R' (without quotes)
3)Press enter and hit y
4) Reboot your PC.

 

[KelvinW4]

Currently no BSODs, no program crashes, check disk logs do not report the problems anymore. I will report back, but the "check" for corrupt sectors can take a really long time

 

[malwarekiller]

here is a all in one solution...

Download Windows Repair (all in one) from here:
http://www.tweaking.com/content/page/windows_repair_all_in_one.html

Install the program then run

Go to step 2 and allow it to run Disc check

Once that is done then go to step 3 and allow it to run SFC

On the start repairs tab select advanced mode and click start

Select all the items given and tick restart system when finished then click Start

 

[pcjunklist]

If your computer is running fine and your chkdisk has no errors, you should be fine.
malwarekiller: There is also no need for programs to run a simple sfc scan.
malkby: Where did you get the information about ntfs not needing a defrag?

You should always ensure that a backup plan is in order. Either a full system image or personal info is stored off pc (cloud or external drive).

 

[KelvinW4]

No bad sectors everything seems fine. Looks like sfc scan has fixed it?