L
LabZero
Thread author
This topic is very controversial: I am documented a lot and I did not find any evidence of users who have paid and have recovered their files, but even to users who have paid and have not recovered. I therefore arrived at the following conclusions:
If anyone, after paying, had not recovered files, most likely they would trace on the net – anyone, after a bad experience, would tell the next to avoid the same fate.
Hackers really should give the private decryption key, the user who pays the ransom, why else would tell on the net to have lost money, advising against the other victims to pay the ransom. This would result in less revenue for hackers.
Hackers have no interest to make files of victims forever inaccessible: their purpose is to make money. As a criminal who asks for money in Exchange for the freedom of a hostage: the criminal has no interest in keeping him hostage, just wants the money.
I believe, therefore, that the payment of the ransom – although feeding the activities of these criminals – network could really allow file retrieval: there I do not put the hand on fire and I also read your comments.
Hello
If anyone, after paying, had not recovered files, most likely they would trace on the net – anyone, after a bad experience, would tell the next to avoid the same fate.
Hackers really should give the private decryption key, the user who pays the ransom, why else would tell on the net to have lost money, advising against the other victims to pay the ransom. This would result in less revenue for hackers.
Hackers have no interest to make files of victims forever inaccessible: their purpose is to make money. As a criminal who asks for money in Exchange for the freedom of a hostage: the criminal has no interest in keeping him hostage, just wants the money.
I believe, therefore, that the payment of the ransom – although feeding the activities of these criminals – network could really allow file retrieval: there I do not put the hand on fire and I also read your comments.
Hello