Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
Death of Windows7?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 823865" data-source="post: 854804"><p>Comparing the incomparable...</p><p>And i can make my Win10 Enterprise as safe than your Win7 + softs , or i can make my Win10 Home + softs as safe or safer than your Win7 + softs, why?</p><p>Because Win7 is more vulnerable than Win10; no argument in that. So if we add the same 3rd party soft, my Win10 will always be safer, because it was made with a more secure architecture; especially if you use win7 x86 which lacks of Patchguard.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't need you to say it , it is a fact. Only ignorants will say otherwise...</p><p></p><p></p><p>Why comparing Win7 + Softs with Win10 default, this is flawed, compare them both with softs then...</p><p></p><p></p><p>It seems you missed the point of the analogy...it was to demonstrate that having a built-in security was better than none...</p><p></p><p></p><p>Nobody asked you to be paranoid. I am among those here that recommend skills/knowledge over stockpiling security tools.</p><p></p><p></p><p>You can stop the dropper, not the kernel exploit itself, and now with fileless attacks, it is even easier to bypass security softs. Just saying...</p><p></p><p></p><p>i see you don't know what is Appcontainer...</p><p>Appcontainer is mostly used by Metro Apps (Edge browser, etc...), it is restriction sandboxing. Users don't have to enable it, they just need to use a metro app like Edge to gain the benefit of it.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Again flawed comparison, you should take Win10 with WD vs Win7 with MSE and EMET, that is the right comparison, everything else is wrong.</p><p>If you take Comodo or whatever , then i should also use it, and the result will still be Win10 safer than Win7.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Obvious again, my ex-employer was a security vendor, and i had "acquaintances" who were malware writers. So what you said doesn't surprise me...it is common knowledge.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Not being exposed to any malware, doesn't make your safe or your security softs awesome...EB targeted businesses because it is a network based kernel exploits, most victims were corporations and organizations, with some poor individuals get caught in betweeen because they probably were connected to the infected network. So obviously your brother wouldn't encounter it.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Same for me, i am one of the few here daring to bash paranoid setup while Win10 + one apps is more than enough.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 823865, post: 854804"] Comparing the incomparable... And i can make my Win10 Enterprise as safe than your Win7 + softs , or i can make my Win10 Home + softs as safe or safer than your Win7 + softs, why? Because Win7 is more vulnerable than Win10; no argument in that. So if we add the same 3rd party soft, my Win10 will always be safer, because it was made with a more secure architecture; especially if you use win7 x86 which lacks of Patchguard. I don't need you to say it , it is a fact. Only ignorants will say otherwise... Why comparing Win7 + Softs with Win10 default, this is flawed, compare them both with softs then... It seems you missed the point of the analogy...it was to demonstrate that having a built-in security was better than none... Nobody asked you to be paranoid. I am among those here that recommend skills/knowledge over stockpiling security tools. You can stop the dropper, not the kernel exploit itself, and now with fileless attacks, it is even easier to bypass security softs. Just saying... i see you don't know what is Appcontainer... Appcontainer is mostly used by Metro Apps (Edge browser, etc...), it is restriction sandboxing. Users don't have to enable it, they just need to use a metro app like Edge to gain the benefit of it. Again flawed comparison, you should take Win10 with WD vs Win7 with MSE and EMET, that is the right comparison, everything else is wrong. If you take Comodo or whatever , then i should also use it, and the result will still be Win10 safer than Win7. Obvious again, my ex-employer was a security vendor, and i had "acquaintances" who were malware writers. So what you said doesn't surprise me...it is common knowledge. Not being exposed to any malware, doesn't make your safe or your security softs awesome...EB targeted businesses because it is a network based kernel exploits, most victims were corporations and organizations, with some poor individuals get caught in betweeen because they probably were connected to the infected network. So obviously your brother wouldn't encounter it. Same for me, i am one of the few here daring to bash paranoid setup while Win10 + one apps is more than enough. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top