Advanced Plus Security Devjit’s Gaming PC 2026

Last updated
Mar 10, 2026
How it's used?
For home and private use
Operating system
Windows 11
Other operating system
None
On-device encryption
N/A
Log-in security
    • Disabled
Security updates
Allow security updates and latest features
Update channels
Allow stable updates only
User Access Control
Always notify
Smart App Control
Off
Network firewall
Enabled
About WiFi router
ISP Router
Real-time security
Norton 360 for Gamers
Firewall security
Other - Internet Security (3rd-party)
About custom security
Windows Hybrid Hardening Light with SWH ON, SmartScreen Block Mode & WDAC ON
Periodic malware scanners
None
Malware sample testing
I do not participate in malware testing
Environment for malware testing
I don’t test malware anymore
Browser(s) and extensions
Microsoft Edge with uBlock Origin.
Secure DNS
Default DNS provided by ISP Router.
Desktop VPN
Windscribe with ads & malware blocked.
Password manager
Bitwarden
Maintenance tools
Windows in-built
File and Photo backup
Google Drive
Subscriptions
    • Google One Premium 2TB
System recovery
Hasleo Backup Suite Free
Risk factors
    • Gaming
Computer specs
Ryzen 7700X
32GB DDR5 RAM
ASUS B650 mobo
Sapphire RX 7900XT
2TB SSD
What I'm looking for?

Looking for minimum feedback.

@Andy Ful does SAC get its info from SmartScreen like WDAC? If WDAC blocks a file and I use runbysmartscreen and if it thinks the file to be safe WDAC allows the file to run. Is it the same with SAC? Suppose a file is blocked by SAC but if I run the file using RunbySmartscreen and if it deems the file to be safe will SAC still block the file? You’re the best person here who can answer this for me.
 
@Andy Ful does SAC get its info from SmartScreen like WDAC?

Yes and No.
Yes, for unsigned files and files with a bad reputation.
However, when the file is signed with an unknown reputation, SAC will allow it.

If WDAC blocks a file and I use runbysmartscreen and if it thinks the file to be safe WDAC allows the file to run.

Yes, that is right. For WDAC + ISG , RunBySmartScreen forces SmartScreen for files with no MotW to decrease the number of false positives. The ISG alone is a very restrictive AI-based file reputation system.

Is it the same with SAC?

No. With SAC, RunBySmartScreen extends protection only for non-EXE files such as scripts, shortcuts, scriptlets, documents, etc.

Suppose a file is blocked by SAC but if I run the file using RunbySmartscreen and if it deems the file to be safe will SAC still block the file?

That cannot happen (as far as I know).
For WDAC + ISG, RunBySmartScreen slightly decreases aggressive blocking of EXE/MSI files.
For SAC, RunBySmartScreen slightly increases protection for non-EXE/MSI files.
 
Yes and No.
Yes, for unsigned files and files with a bad reputation.
However, when the file is signed with an unknown reputation, SAC will allow it.



Yes, that is right. For WDAC + ISG , RunBySmartScreen forces SmartScreen for files with no MotW to decrease the number of false positives. The ISG alone is a very restrictive AI-based file reputation system.



No. With SAC, RunBySmartScreen extends protection only for non-EXE files such as scripts, shortcuts, scriptlets, documents, etc.



That cannot happen (as far as I know).
For WDAC + ISG, RunBySmartScreen slightly decreases aggressive blocking of EXE/MSI files.
For SAC, RunBySmartScreen slightly increases protection for non-EXE/MSI files.
Beautifully explained….thank you.
 
MS PC Manager is good if you prefer it, and it's sufficient if you don't want to clean the system registry. I personally don't like it and prefer Reg Organizer over it.

For a password manager, the best free options available that sync online are Bitwarden and Proton Pass.
Do you know if PC manager works only with Edge browser?
 
The XFX and PowerColor cards are great. I went with Sapphire because it was readily available at a great price. If only AMD made FSR4 available to the 7000 series :cautious:
There’s always swapping the DLL with the leaked version for RDNA 3 and using optiscalar.

Also, what cooler do you use for your 7700x?
 
There’s always swapping the DLL with the leaked version for RDNA 3 and using optiscalar.

Also, what cooler do you use for your 7700x?
I have an arctic 360mm AIO. I’ve changed 2 things on the CPU side-

1) changed the max temps to 80 degrees(since I personally find 90 to be too hot for my liking).

2) did not change PPT, EDC, TDC but let AMD Ryzen Master find the optimal curve for my CPU. Till now it has worked extremely well without any crashes and max temps around 75C while gaming on a hot day with the AC set to 25C.
 
  • Like
Reactions: blackice
I have an arctic 360mm AIO. I’ve changed 2 things on the CPU side-

1) changed the max temps to 80 degrees(since I personally find 90 to be too hot for my liking).

2) did not change PPT, EDC, TDC but let AMD Ryzen Master find the optimal curve for my CPU. Till now it has worked extremely well without any crashes and max temps around 75C while gaming on a hot day with the AC set to 25C.
Mine won’t undervolt almost at all without throwing errors cycling cores in OCCT. The numbers Ryzen master gave me lead to instant blue screens. I used an AIO for a while and that kept my temps just below 90° with all core workloads (I compress a lot of video files). But with the price or ram and GPUs I decided I wanted no chance of leaks and went back to my good air cooler. Eco mode is fine, but I can cap the PPT and get just about 1.5% slower for about 85°. The air cooler can pretty much run the chip just below max temps at full load on stock until it starts getting warm outside. But I agree, with how often I leave it running for 8 hours compressing my blu rays I don’t want to leave it sitting at 95 and slowing down gradually. Also it makes the room hot to pull over 130W for that long.
 
Mine won’t undervolt almost at all without throwing errors cycling cores in OCCT. The numbers Ryzen master gave me lead to instant blue screens. I used an AIO for a while and that kept my temps just below 90° with all core workloads (I compress a lot of video files). But with the price or ram and GPUs I decided I wanted no chance of leaks and went back to my good air cooler. Eco mode is fine, but I can cap the PPT and get just about 1.5% slower for about 85°. The air cooler can pretty much run the chip just below max temps at full load on stock until it starts getting warm outside. But I agree, with how often I leave it running for 8 hours compressing my blu rays I don’t want to leave it sitting at 95 and slowing down gradually. Also it makes the room hot to pull over 130W for that long.
I suggest that you start with a negative curve offset (-10) and see if your CPU is stable. If it’s rock stable, increase it to -15. Do this in increments of 5 steps until the CPU is no longer stable. Do you have a custom loop or CLC? If it’s a CLC, no need to worry about leakage. You can also go to BIOS and set the throttling temps to 90 degrees.
 
I suggest that you start with a negative curve offset (-10) and see if your CPU is stable. If it’s rock stable, increase it to -15. Do this in increments of 5 steps until the CPU is no longer stable. Do you have a custom loop or CLC? If it’s a CLC, no need to worry about leakage. You can also go to BIOS and set the throttling temps to 90 degrees.
I had a 5800x that could run -16. This 7700x isn't stable below -8, and -3 on a couple of the cores. It's not worth the effort to adjust and test since there is no temperature change or much extra boost at these low offsets. At that point I prefer stability. The reason I prefer a PPT setting to a Temp setting is this: Gaming goes to about 70C whether in Eco or Stock, with the exception of building shaders. The issue I see when people set a temp limit is you actually lose clocks when running heavy single threaded applications. A single core can run up to 90 easy temporarily. If you limit it to say 70C you lose a lot of boost in these single core situations. I'm guessing that most people who read on reddit to just slap a -30 and roll have pretty unstable PCs. If you've ever gotten corruption or sudden blue screens during low loads you know the pain of this. I agree CLCs are mostly safe...but when they aren't they aren't. I literally don't have the money to replace any components at current prices, so why bother for -4C.
 
I had a 5800x that could run -16. This 7700x isn't stable below -8, and -3 on a couple of the cores. It's not worth the effort to adjust and test since there is no temperature change or much extra boost at these low offsets. At that point I prefer stability. The reason I prefer a PPT setting to a Temp setting is this: Gaming goes to about 70C whether in Eco or Stock, with the exception of building shaders. The issue I see when people set a temp limit is you actually lose clocks when running heavy single threaded applications. A single core can run up to 90 easy temporarily. If you limit it to say 70C you lose a lot of boost in these single core situations. I'm guessing that most people who read on reddit to just slap a -30 and roll have pretty unstable PCs. If you've ever gotten corruption or sudden blue screens during low loads you know the pain of this. I agree CLCs are mostly safe...but when they aren't they aren't. I literally don't have the money to replace any components at current prices, so why bother for -4C.
Yeah I did have blue screens on idle when Ryzen Master set the offset to -20. Manually changing them to -10 got rid of the issue.