I dsiable the whole web guard of Avast during the limited periods I use; I prefer to wait until the malware land safely.
Last edited:
Divine_Barakah's PC Security Config 2026
- Thread starter Divine_Barakah
- Start date
I believe https scanning deployed by vendors undermines security. It causes too many issues. I am restoring a clean system image now and I will test MD for a while. If I do not like it, I will install TM as I still have 3 years in my subscription.
Oh Lord forgive me for I have sinned. I installed Webroot 
One more update. I blocked installing Driver in Windows Update and deferred quality updates for 14 days.
For drivers updates, I am using Dell Command Update. I have had issues with Windows Update pushing generic drivers.
For drivers updates, I am using Dell Command Update. I have had issues with Windows Update pushing generic drivers.
Back to roots.
x-change is the best pdf app hands down
The most stable.
With small files, it uses the same RAM as Foxit; with huge files, it may leak memory to some extent if the file was opened for a long time; still more memory friendly than Adobe.
I had to quit using Chinese software for security reasons, regardless of how good some of.
So according to this link, Webroot is a blessing in disguise?
Webroot » AVLab Cybersecurity Foundation
Webroot solutions are the answer to the global problem of ransomware and zero-day malware, which few million appear every day worldwide.
avlab.pl
Analysing the results shows that Webroot extension accounts for %96.91 of detection. Only %3.09 slipped through and allowed to run only to be detected by Webroot's cloud detection.So according to this link, Webroot is a blessing in disguise?
Webroot » AVLab Cybersecurity Foundation
Webroot solutions are the answer to the global problem of ransomware and zero-day malware, which few million appear every day worldwide.
It is weird that this is the only testing lab that gives Webroot a favourable rating and awards it "product of the year"
The problem I see with AV's is that they weigh several factors before issuing a deny. For example, if script file is obfuscated AND file resides in C:\Users\<YourUsername>\AppData\ AND .... then quarantine it. Whereas you can use HIDS or similar and make a hard rule to say no executables allowed in AppData period. (because you never install per user apps). Then it wouldn't matter if the AV cannot figure out the obfuscation and the other 5 conditions don't match because an AV has to be oh so careful so as to not make a false positive. You know how you use your system. A hard rule is easier to enforce. And you will be safer for it.
Also hackers make discreet actions. Their work may not follow a recognizable malware chain of attack, it may follow a TTP. Thus a hard rule also stops hands on keyboard attacks. Whereas AV's traditionally fail against live human adversaries.
Also hackers make discreet actions. Their work may not follow a recognizable malware chain of attack, it may follow a TTP. Thus a hard rule also stops hands on keyboard attacks. Whereas AV's traditionally fail against live human adversaries.
Last edited:
Have you used OSArmor before? How do you like it, is the rule language powerful and flexible ?
No it is my first time using it. I have always felt tempted to use it and now it is time. I need some time to learn more about and get used to it. I will share more later.
