Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
Do we actually need so many security programs?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 775037" data-attributes="member: 32260"><p><strong>Test continuation with script trojan-downloaders.</strong></p><p>The testing scripts adopted 7 different methods of downloading files and 8 different methods of executing files from scripts. I used VBScript and PowerShell.</p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 18px"><span style="color: rgb(0, 168, 133)"><strong>mks_vir Internet Secutity (MKSV)</strong></span></span></p><p>MKSV on default settings blocked all samples, except those which used Bitsadmin. Yet, most PowerShell samples were blocked only via the Firewall rule (blocked outbound connections). The VBScript samples which used WMI were also blocked by the Firewall rule for wscript.exe (blocked outbound connections).</p><p>Most VBScript samples were blocked by heuristics (static detection) and it can be compared to BitDefender static detection.</p><p>MKSV has a very good protection against script trojan-downloaders. Yet, it is not perfect (can be bypassed, for example, by CHM scriptlets).</p><p>It is hard to compare MKSV to KIS, because KIS on default settings is not as good as MKSV, but KIS tweaked can also block all testing samples and additionally can detect/block other types of malicious scripts by AMSI or by blocking script interpreters.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 775037, member: 32260"] [B]Test continuation with script trojan-downloaders.[/B] The testing scripts adopted 7 different methods of downloading files and 8 different methods of executing files from scripts. I used VBScript and PowerShell. [SIZE=18px][COLOR=rgb(0, 168, 133)][B]mks_vir Internet Secutity (MKSV)[/B][/COLOR][/SIZE] MKSV on default settings blocked all samples, except those which used Bitsadmin. Yet, most PowerShell samples were blocked only via the Firewall rule (blocked outbound connections). The VBScript samples which used WMI were also blocked by the Firewall rule for wscript.exe (blocked outbound connections). Most VBScript samples were blocked by heuristics (static detection) and it can be compared to BitDefender static detection. MKSV has a very good protection against script trojan-downloaders. Yet, it is not perfect (can be bypassed, for example, by CHM scriptlets). It is hard to compare MKSV to KIS, because KIS on default settings is not as good as MKSV, but KIS tweaked can also block all testing samples and additionally can detect/block other types of malicious scripts by AMSI or by blocking script interpreters. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top