Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
Do we actually need so many security programs?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="shmu26" data-source="post: 819845" data-attributes="member: 37647"><p>Actually, I have discovered that "Low Restricted" is more restricted than it appears at first glance. For instance, I have a certain app called TogglDesktop that runs from the Appdata directory. Kaspersky trusts it. But if you move it to Low Restricted, it is denied automatic network access, <strong>even if you enable "Perform recommended actions automatically."</strong> AFAIK this is not stated in the rules of Low Restricted. It seems to be an under-the-hood restriction, and a very smart one at that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="shmu26, post: 819845, member: 37647"] Actually, I have discovered that "Low Restricted" is more restricted than it appears at first glance. For instance, I have a certain app called TogglDesktop that runs from the Appdata directory. Kaspersky trusts it. But if you move it to Low Restricted, it is denied automatic network access, [B]even if you enable "Perform recommended actions automatically."[/B] AFAIK this is not stated in the rules of Low Restricted. It seems to be an under-the-hood restriction, and a very smart one at that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top