Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Security Statistics and Reports
Do you understand Malware Protection tests?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nagisa" data-source="post: 932794" data-attributes="member: 73722"><p>If you exclude the low prevalence file default-deny popup (not something that should be done), some of the files are catched and terminated because of attempt to do an unauthorized change. The remaining runs on the system and AEGIS with it's behavioral detection kicks in sometimes but it's either not as aggressive or the samples downloaded from abuse.ch are not that serious ones. To be honest I would expect post-execution Predictive Machine Learning detections to be happen more often, because what it does is catching unknown malware. Maybe, the samples are not doing anything malicious right now in the system.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]254794[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]254792[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]254793[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>This of course is the worst case scenario. However I have positive thoughts about its continuous update of threat signatures. When I scan the remainings in the folder, more and more files gets detected throughout the same day.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nagisa, post: 932794, member: 73722"] If you exclude the low prevalence file default-deny popup (not something that should be done), some of the files are catched and terminated because of attempt to do an unauthorized change. The remaining runs on the system and AEGIS with it's behavioral detection kicks in sometimes but it's either not as aggressive or the samples downloaded from abuse.ch are not that serious ones. To be honest I would expect post-execution Predictive Machine Learning detections to be happen more often, because what it does is catching unknown malware. Maybe, the samples are not doing anything malicious right now in the system. [ATTACH type="full" alt="1614633248439.png"]254794[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]254792[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]254793[/ATTACH] This of course is the worst case scenario. However I have positive thoughts about its continuous update of threat signatures. When I scan the remainings in the folder, more and more files gets detected throughout the same day. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top