Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Comodo
Drawbacks of Comodo Cruelsister Config
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AtlBo" data-source="post: 832070" data-attributes="member: 32547"><p>Yes, this is a good point [USER=71262]@oldschool[/USER]. I used to do this, but the list is so long, I just gave up. It's actually not that hard, but you have to start with your own short list you would like to use. Once in the TVL, put a check box all of the vendors using the checkbox header at the top. Search for your first one (i.e. Microsoft) in the TVL header for the vendor name to find those and then uncheck them. Move to the next vendor search that vendor and uncheck those. When finished with your vendors, click delete to delete all the vendors that are still checked.</p><p></p><p>I really gave up trimming, because I felt that the Comodo list was good enough really. I'm sure it could be better, but I know that a developer would be in bad shape if he did Comodo wrong. It's fairly powerful incentive for a dev to stay out of trouble, since Comodo sells digital signatures.</p><p></p><p>In the end, I can trim the TVL to a hundred entries or so from, say, 50 companies. But then, I feel the list is too short when something new comes out, and the dev isn't in the list. So I finally gave in to trusting Comodo with the list. For me, trusting the list made the program better. That said, the massive TVL is definitely one reason why I also run HIPs, and I would consider it a good enough reason to run something underneath Comodo Firewall such as NVT OSArmor, SysHardener, Hard_Configurator, AppCheck, an a-v etc...<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AtlBo, post: 832070, member: 32547"] Yes, this is a good point [USER=71262]@oldschool[/USER]. I used to do this, but the list is so long, I just gave up. It's actually not that hard, but you have to start with your own short list you would like to use. Once in the TVL, put a check box all of the vendors using the checkbox header at the top. Search for your first one (i.e. Microsoft) in the TVL header for the vendor name to find those and then uncheck them. Move to the next vendor search that vendor and uncheck those. When finished with your vendors, click delete to delete all the vendors that are still checked. I really gave up trimming, because I felt that the Comodo list was good enough really. I'm sure it could be better, but I know that a developer would be in bad shape if he did Comodo wrong. It's fairly powerful incentive for a dev to stay out of trouble, since Comodo sells digital signatures. In the end, I can trim the TVL to a hundred entries or so from, say, 50 companies. But then, I feel the list is too short when something new comes out, and the dev isn't in the list. So I finally gave in to trusting Comodo with the list. For me, trusting the list made the program better. That said, the massive TVL is definitely one reason why I also run HIPs, and I would consider it a good enough reason to run something underneath Comodo Firewall such as NVT OSArmor, SysHardener, Hard_Configurator, AppCheck, an a-v etc...:) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top