What are the major differences between those 3? Do they all function the same?
Which one do you think is closest to bulletproof? are DV and RBRX equal as far as the security?
Now would you recommend RX PRO if I allready have Shadow Defender? Will they conflict? Will they use up too many resources?
How large are the snapshots? Are they as large as True Image ones?1. Yes\No (not necessary to combo; duplicate protection)
2. No
3. No (both very low resource usage)
Rollback RX Pro has the ability to encrypt the snapshots when the password is enabled. Therefore, it is more secure than Shadow Defender.
You can set Rollback RX to restore your system to the same, clean baseline snapshot upon every system reboot - which is essentially the same as Shadow Defender.
However, you can use Shadow Defender "on-demand" for malware testing - while keeping existing snapshot.
How large are the snapshots? Are they as large as True Image ones?
Thank you all so far I have decided not to go with the solution I am staying with Shadow Defender. But it's very good to know for my future endevours.RX use your real system as "baseline" , so: baseline size + 100-300mb,
then redirect everything written from that baseline to a hidden space of the HDD called "Snapshot" , which size is :
Total space usage of anything written since baseline + 100-200mb
I use the word written, because RX save everything new (tmp files, event logs, Windows Defender signatures, etc...) not only installed programs.
RX's snapshots are incremental, means if you write file called AAA on snapshot 1 , create snapshot 2 and then delete File AAA on snapshot 3; file AAA is still present on Snapshot 1 and 2.
During installation of RX , you have the choice o select which partitions to protect , more partitions you add, more space a snapshot will take.
for more infos on RX : Rollback RX users guidelines
RX is the ultimate one for software/malwares testers , however a bad use can smash your system and wreck your partitions for good.