Everything You Need to Know about Elon Musk's $44bn Twitter acquisition

Status
Not open for further replies.

plat

Level 29
Top Poster
Sep 13, 2018
1,793

The directive is to change Twitter Blue, the company’s optional, $4.99 a month subscription that unlocks additional features, into a more expensive subscription that also verifies users, according to people familiar with the matter and internal correspondence seen by The Verge. Twitter is planning to charge $19.99 for the new Twitter Blue subscription, though that price is subject to change. Employees working on the project were told on Sunday that they need to meet a deadline of November 7th to launch the feature or they will be fired.
 

oldschool

Level 82
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Mar 29, 2018
7,107
Good grief “they need to meet a deadline of November 7th to launch the feature or they will be fired.” The American dream…give me a break.
Tesla/Musk is notorious for its labor practices so this is by no means a surprise. And then there is this:
Musk’s first order of business has been figuring out who he wants to keep in Twitter’s engineering organization. On Friday, engineers were asked to print out their recent code contributions from the last 30 to 60 days and bring them to be reviewed by Musk and Tesla engineers. They were then quickly told to shred their print outs and show the code on their computers instead, as first reported by Platformer’s Casey Newton. Some engineers have been glued to a Twitter account that tracks the whereabouts of Musk’s private jet, expecting him and the Tesla engineers to visit the company’s New York City office on Monday to continue code reviews.
Managers have been told that the purpose of the reviews is for Musk to see who can work at the speed and efficiency he demands, and that he wants to weed out engineering managers who do not regularly write code. “Managers in software must write great software or it’s like being a cavalry captain who can’t ride a horse!” he tweeted in May.
This is vintage Musk.

All of which is just show, or frosting on the cake, and is what happens when you're an over-leveraged owner.

Also, this humble proposal :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
 
Last edited:

blackice

Level 38
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Apr 1, 2019
2,781
Tesla/Musk is notorious for its labor practices so this is by no means a surprise. And then there is this:

This is vintage Musk.

All of which is just show, or frosting on the cake, and is what happens when you're an over-leveraged owner.

Also, this humble proposal :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
There isn’t a billionaire alive who wasn’t either lucky or a piece of human garbage. Generally it’s both. Nobody who micromanages like that is actually a good manager.
 

simmerskool

Level 31
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Apr 16, 2017
2,094
Another take on Musk's very bad, over-leveraged deal:
This will be sweet vengeance.
fwiw: I went to the bulwark (not from your link), began process to sign up for free (the triad) followed by tons of email trackers, like a DDoS attack on my inbox. could have been a fluke, I'm a tad obscure tonight. (I'm not familiar with The Bulwark)
 

monkeylove

Level 11
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Mar 9, 2014
544

upnorth

Moderator
Thread author
Verified
Staff Member
Malware Hunter
Well-known
Jul 27, 2015
5,459
Due to Musk's views on free speech, EU regulators have already begun pressing Musk on this point, even before he tweeted the misinformation about the Pelosi attack. Reuters reported that last week, Musk promised the European Commission that Twitter would comply with the DSA. In the coming weeks, Musk will meet with EU industry chief Thierry Breton, seemingly to address Breton’s concerns over how Musk might be planning to change Twitter content moderation.

No one is sure how Musk's vision of Twitter will play out, but he'll likely continue to face pressure from advertisers, regulators, and Twitter users. At a time when Musk needs to squeeze profits from his Twitter acquisition—after already taking on $13 billion in debt—it seems less than ideal to also risk millions in DSA fines. But Musk also faces pressure from popular accounts that expect him to follow through on his promise to prioritize free speech on Twitter.
 

vtqhtr413

Level 26
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Aug 17, 2017
1,489
One of Elon Musk's first actions after purchasing Twitter for $44 billion was the firing of three prominent executives. CEO Parag Agrawal, CFO Ned Segal, and the company's legal head Vijaya Gadde were all shown the door a few days ago, but it wasn't all bad news for the former board members. In addition to the tens of millions they were set to receive for their substantial amounts of Twitter stock, all three executives had a "golden parachute" clause in place. The clause meant the three would each receive a share of $120 million. But as with everything else in the Elon Musk/Twitter saga, it's not as straightforward as that.

The golden parachute isn't the only money the executives received from the deal. During their time at Twitter, each board member accumulated a large amount of stock in the company. As was the case with every other shareholder, their stock was snapped up by Musk at a price of $54.20 per share when the deal was finalized. In toal, the three board members had around 1.2 million shares in the company, which, at the time of the takeover, were worth $65 million. Not every board member had an equal number of shares, as Vijaya Gadde had the most of the three, with her stock being valued at around $35 million.

Should the golden parachute ever get paid out, the three executives would again receive different amounts. Former CEO Parag Agrawal would be the big winner there, with his payout being somewhere in the region of $56 million. The clause also includes other perks, such as paying out an additional year's salary to each board member that was let go and extending their health benefits for a year as well.

 

Gandalf_The_Grey

Level 76
Verified
Honorary Member
Top Poster
Content Creator
Well-known
Apr 24, 2016
6,593
Elon Musk Details $8/Month Twitter Blue With More Features
Elon Musk, the new official CEO of Twitter has detailed how he plans to revamp the company’s Twitter Blue subscription. Musk previously said that he wanted Twitter’s verification badge to become a Twitter Blue perk and raise the subscription’s price from $4.99/month to $19.99 month, but the exec has apparently listened to the negative feedback from users.

In a series of tweets published earlier today, Musk said he wanted Twitter Blue to cost $8/month going forward. He also added that “Twitter’s current lords & peasants system for who has or doesn’t have a blue checkmark is bullshit.”

In addition to getting a verified badge, Musk wants to get Twitter Blue subscribers some new perks including priority in replies, mentions, and search, the ability to post longer video and audio clips, and a number of ads reduced by half. Musk also mentioned a “paywall bypass for publishers willing to work with us.”

According to Musk adding new perks to Twitter Blue while slightly raising its price will also “give Twitter a revenue stream to reward content creators.” This is something that platforms like YouTube and Twitch already do by allowing creators to monetize their content, though Musk has yet to share details about how that would work on Twitter.

Twitter Blue is still only available in the US, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, and expanding the service to more markets is also something Musk will need to think about pretty quickly. Last but not least, it’s also not clear how allowing everyone to pay to get a verified badge will prevent people from impersonating others on Twitter.
 

enaph

Level 28
Verified
Honorary Member
Top Poster
Well-known
Jun 14, 2011
1,790
The world’s richest man has been reviewing the company’s code with help from Tesla Inc. engineers, while consulting with powerful friends he trusts to help him make important decisions about where to take the product.
 

plat

Level 29
Top Poster
Sep 13, 2018
1,793
Nov 1, 2022
28
Elon Musk Details $8/Month Twitter Blue With More Features

I'm not sure where all this is going... Imposing a higher paywall for content creators while inciting them with new perks down the line for something they would've kept on doing either way, seems counter intuitive, doesn't it? How can this add to Twitter's overall "growth"? Or am I missing something?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

About us

  • MalwareTips is a community-driven platform providing the latest information and resources on malware and cyber threats. Our team of experienced professionals and passionate volunteers work to keep the internet safe and secure. We provide accurate, up-to-date information and strive to build a strong and supportive community dedicated to cybersecurity.

User Menu

Follow us

Follow us on Facebook or Twitter to know first about the latest cybersecurity incidents and malware threats.

Top