Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
ESET
ESET 13.1.16.0
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BVLon" data-source="post: 866627"><p>Testing McAfee against this archive for example would be totally inaccurate, as Web Advisor uses aggressive heuristics and deletes everything that looks untrusted. McAfee doesn't want to employ the same tactic in the common scanning engine to avoid false positives, but their protection capability is still great. Web Advisor also uses 2 additional databases, not utilized by the scan engine. These are McAfee Gateway Intelligence, which detects untrusted files circulating via emails and Early Bird Database (EBD) where they send all files exhibiting signs of maliciousness, but not yet fully analysed. When I say McAfee is missing a lot of threats, I am talking about the AV module alone, as I have bypassed the Advisor's warnings myself. Their behavioural blocker alone is a hit and miss. Also I have noticed (and McAfee confirmed) if you re-download a program that it has already flagged and removed, it excludes it, which is not great.</p><p>Norton, F-Secure and Trend Micro's behavioural blockers consider broad range of data about the file's origin such as how trustworthy is the site and how many people normally visit it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BVLon, post: 866627"] Testing McAfee against this archive for example would be totally inaccurate, as Web Advisor uses aggressive heuristics and deletes everything that looks untrusted. McAfee doesn't want to employ the same tactic in the common scanning engine to avoid false positives, but their protection capability is still great. Web Advisor also uses 2 additional databases, not utilized by the scan engine. These are McAfee Gateway Intelligence, which detects untrusted files circulating via emails and Early Bird Database (EBD) where they send all files exhibiting signs of maliciousness, but not yet fully analysed. When I say McAfee is missing a lot of threats, I am talking about the AV module alone, as I have bypassed the Advisor's warnings myself. Their behavioural blocker alone is a hit and miss. Also I have noticed (and McAfee confirmed) if you re-download a program that it has already flagged and removed, it excludes it, which is not great. Norton, F-Secure and Trend Micro's behavioural blockers consider broad range of data about the file's origin such as how trustworthy is the site and how many people normally visit it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top