Does this product fit in your preferred AVs list?

  • Yes, absolutely

    Votes: 43 64.2%
  • Kind of, want it to provide more features

    Votes: 3 4.5%
  • Kind of, want it to provide higher scores of protection

    Votes: 11 16.4%
  • Mix of above two options

    Votes: 7 10.4%
  • Nope, let me tell you why!

    Votes: 3 4.5%
  • Total voters
    67
  • Poll closed .
Software
ESET Internet Security 13.1.21.0
Installation
5.00 star(s)
Installation Feedback
+ Simple and smooth
Interface (UI)
4.00 star(s)
Interface Feedback
+ Main GUI is fairly simple for an average user
- Module categorization in main GUI and in Settings are not in tune, might come across as confusing
+- Some old users like this aging interface, some do not
Usability
5.00 star(s)
Usability Feedback
+ Very simple by default. Automated
+ Learning curve required in not high
+- Advanced protection modules require good info about OS and how it works
Performance and System Impact
5.00 star(s)
Performance and System Impact Feedback
++ One of the lightest AVs
- Slows down explorer.exe when opening a folder full of executables (detecting PUAs etc), like some other AVs
Protection
5.00 star(s)
Protection Feedback
+ Automated protection at default, good enough for average users
+ Memory scanning/ file-less malware protection/ Banking protection rated high in some 3rd party tests
+ Signatures / DNA detection among the best
+ Provides highly configurable HIPS & Firewall for advanced protection
- Known not to be very effective VS unknown malware
- Configuring well or setting HIPS & Firewall to interactive mode needs good knowledge of OS
https://www.av-comparatives.org/tests/enhanced-real-world-test-2019-consumer
https://www.mrg-effitas.com/research/current-state-of-malicious-powershell-script-blocking
https://www.mrg-effitas.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2019_Online_BankingQ4.pdf
https://www.mrg-effitas.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/MRG_Effitas_2019Q4_360.pdf
Real-time file system protection
5.00 star(s)
Internet Surf protection
5.00 star(s)
Proactive Intrusion protection
4.00 star(s)
Network protection
5.00 star(s)
Pros
Lots of great features
Low impact on system resources
Highly configurable
Strong and reliable protection
Excellent scores in independent tests
Multiple layers of protection
Cons
Mixed results from independent testing labs
Can be complex in some situations
Software installed on computer
More than 30 days
Computer Specifications
Intel i5 4th Gen (upto 2.3Ghz Turbo) | 8GB DDR3 | 1TB HDD | AMD Radeon 8670M Graphics (2GB)
Recommended for
All types of users
Overall Rating
5.00 star(s)
Disclaimer

Any views or opinions expressed are that of the member giving the information and may be subjective.
This software may behave differently on your device.

We encourage you to compare these opinions with others and take informed decisions on what security products to use.
Before buying a product you should consider factors such as price, ease of use, compatibility, and support. Installing a free trial version allows an antivirus to be tested in everyday use before purchase.

SeriousHoax

Level 29
Verified
Malware Tester
Yes I do appreciate that however the newsletter was from ESET & recommended using a VPN - I personally don't provide a VPN service either, but I can recommend the idea? Did you read the link?
Yes I read it. They wrote the article from a neutral point of view and talked about the importance of using a VPN without promoting any specific VPN provider.
 

Cortex

Level 22
Verified
Yes I read it. They wrote the article from a neutral point of view and talked about the importance of using a VPN without promoting any specific VPN provider.
Yes I agree, I was just passing on info (actually the URL) from a newsletter that others may have found interesting - I didn't infer that ESET recommended any VPN, or that ESET offers a VPN - Simply that they (or at least that person in the email) felt it was a good idea, & I agree with with that -Though some feel a VPN is not necessary & people are entitled to their view.point as always.
 

cruelsister

Level 37
Verified
Trusted
Content Creator
A word of warning regarding ESET-

Although ESET has improved in detection of various types of Scriptors, some malware authors have circumvented the need for scripting in Powershell, Python, etc and have utilized other avenues to achieve similar results. These methods can yield malware that is harder for some AV applications to detect as they can be based on stuff like certutil, a valid command.

ESET has issues with this type of malware, even with the HIPS set at max protection. A ransomware file can be coded simply and easily to bypass the HIPS and encrypt files. Also, as coding is rather straightforward, the file would be zero day and bypass the AV.

This issue is by no means restricted to ESET, as programs from Forticlient to SEP will also fail. However quite a few (like Kaspersky, Avast/AVG, CF) will laugh at this stuff and block it quite easily.
 

DDE_Server

Level 21
Verified
A word of warning regarding ESET-

Although ESET has improved in detection of various types of Scriptors, some malware authors have circumvented the need for scripting in Powershell, Python, etc and have utilized other avenues to achieve similar results. These methods can yield malware that is harder for some AV applications to detect as they can be based on stuff like certutil, a valid command.

ESET has issues with this type of malware, even with the HIPS set at max protection. A ransomware file can be coded simply and easily to bypass the HIPS and encrypt files. Also, as coding is rather straightforward, the file would be zero day and bypass the AV.

This issue is by no means restricted to ESET, as programs from Forticlient to SEP will also fail. However quite a few (like Kaspersky, Avast/AVG, CF) will laugh at this stuff and block it quite easily.
Long time cruel sister. hope you are fine @cruelsister
 

bribon77

Level 33
Verified
A word of warning regarding ESET-

Although ESET has improved in detection of various types of Scriptors, some malware authors have circumvented the need for scripting in Powershell, Python, etc and have utilized other avenues to achieve similar results. These methods can yield malware that is harder for some AV applications to detect as they can be based on stuff like certutil, a valid command.

ESET has issues with this type of malware, even with the HIPS set at max protection. A ransomware file can be coded simply and easily to bypass the HIPS and encrypt files. Also, as coding is rather straightforward, the file would be zero day and bypass the AV.

This issue is by no means restricted to ESET, as programs from Forticlient to SEP will also fail. However quite a few (like Kaspersky, Avast/AVG, CF) will laugh at this stuff and block it quite easily.
I'm glad to see you again.(y)
 

SeriousHoax

Level 29
Verified
Malware Tester
A word of warning regarding ESET-

Although ESET has improved in detection of various types of Scriptors, some malware authors have circumvented the need for scripting in Powershell, Python, etc and have utilized other avenues to achieve similar results. These methods can yield malware that is harder for some AV applications to detect as they can be based on stuff like certutil, a valid command.

ESET has issues with this type of malware, even with the HIPS set at max protection. A ransomware file can be coded simply and easily to bypass the HIPS and encrypt files. Also, as coding is rather straightforward, the file would be zero day and bypass the AV.

This issue is by no means restricted to ESET, as programs from Forticlient to SEP will also fail. However quite a few (like Kaspersky, Avast/AVG, CF) will laugh at this stuff and block it quite easily.
This is not entirely correct. At least it's not gonna be the case always. ESET's strength is pre-execution based. It's possible that these type of malwares will already be detected by Eset's Adanced DNA analysis before it could even execute. No other AV is currently as good as ESET in this department. We all know more or less that if something gets past ESET's real time protection the user is almost certain to get infected. HIPS is not a behavior blocker so not comparable to Kaspersky/AVG's behavior blocker. Also I don't know what you meant by HIPS at max settings. There is no such settings in ESET.
 

SeriousHoax

Level 29
Verified
Malware Tester
I believe that Kaspersky has ha hips, right?
Kaspersky has Application Control which is amazing. You can literally control permissions of every applications on your PC. It also has a manage resource module a part of application control which can be used to control even more system related things, configure protected folders and a lot more. It's different from ESET's HIPS. Kaspersky's module can do many things that ESET can't do but ESET's HIPS can do and create different type of custom rules that Kaspersky can't do. Application Control is far more smart and they also have System watcher which can detect and rollback malicious actions. ESET HIPS is useful for making advance custom rules.
 
Top