Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
ESET Smart Premium vs Malwarebytes Premium with latest nasties.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="simmerskool" data-source="post: 1025823" data-attributes="member: 61091"><p>It was very hard to tell if this user / "tester" was using ESET & MBAM correctly. As others have pointed out, running 3000+ malware at once is unrealistic. But also the av were giving him popups to make a selection unclear what tester was doing with those. I currently run ESET Premium, and I've had its LiveGuard feature pause and upload suspected malware to its cloud for analysis, and within a few minutes it comes back with its result. It seemed obvious that this tester was not keeping up with popups, and it was unclear if he was making proper selections. To me, it looked like the tester "broke" the computer, not the malware. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite132" alt=":unsure:" title="Unsure :unsure:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":unsure:" /> He was clueless as to which sample(s) caused infection. What he might have done, run the 3000 malware if that's his inclination. Take his time and figure out which sample(s) went undetected, if any, and then video a test with those undetected sample(s) to show what and perhaps how the samples went undetected. (my 2 cents)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="simmerskool, post: 1025823, member: 61091"] It was very hard to tell if this user / "tester" was using ESET & MBAM correctly. As others have pointed out, running 3000+ malware at once is unrealistic. But also the av were giving him popups to make a selection unclear what tester was doing with those. I currently run ESET Premium, and I've had its LiveGuard feature pause and upload suspected malware to its cloud for analysis, and within a few minutes it comes back with its result. It seemed obvious that this tester was not keeping up with popups, and it was unclear if he was making proper selections. To me, it looked like the tester "broke" the computer, not the malware. :unsure: He was clueless as to which sample(s) caused infection. What he might have done, run the 3000 malware if that's his inclination. Take his time and figure out which sample(s) went undetected, if any, and then video a test with those undetected sample(s) to show what and perhaps how the samples went undetected. (my 2 cents) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top