Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Browsers
Web Extensions
extensions can help a lot against phishing
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Vitali Ortzi" data-source="post: 1112226" data-attributes="member: 57714"><p>[MEDIA=youtube]zhaOkUL7xDA[/MEDIA]</p><p></p><p>showcasing how extensions can add a lot of added detection against phishing with all pishing links in the video detected by category blocking as the only link not detected was a false positive at 6:55 (there is zero phishing tech in checkpoint extension that wasn't showcased as everything was blocked purely by category blocking )</p><p></p><p>note checkpoint and symantec have been configured and aren't in default config (changes are mainly added categories )</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>extensions used in the test :</p><p>checkpoint <a href="https://malwaretips.com/threads/extension-checkpoint-harmony-web-protection.133377/" target="_blank">Serious Discussion - [Extension]Checkpoint harmony web protection</a></p><p>symantec <a href="https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/symantec-browser-protecti/hielpjjagjimpgppnopiibaefhfpbpfn" target="_blank">Symantec Browser Protection - Chrome Web Store</a></p><p>trafficlight <a href="https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/trafficlight/cfnpidifppmenkapgihekkeednfoenal" target="_blank">TrafficLight - Chrome Web Store</a></p><p>microsoft <a href="https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/microsoft-defender-browse/bkbeeeffjjeopflfhgeknacdieedcoml" target="_blank">Microsoft Defender Browser Protection - Chrome Web Store</a></p><p></p><p>feeds used for the test :</p><p>[CODE]https://db.aa419.org/fakebankslist.php</p><p>https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Phishing-Database/Phishing.Database/refs/heads/master/phishing-links-NEW-today.txt</p><p>https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openphish/public_feed/refs/heads/main/feed.txt[/CODE]</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>performance related data (symantec isnt popular enough to get tested by debug bear lookup and only an older version of checkpoint extension was tested by debug bear )</p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.debugbear.com/chrome-extension-performance-lookup[/URL]</p><p>[ATTACH]286755[/ATTACH][ATTACH]286757[/ATTACH][ATTACH]286759[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>idle usage (symantec , checkpoint services running with zero cpu usage and around 30mb+ ram each )</p><p>[ATTACH]286760[/ATTACH]</p><p>possible configs</p><p>[ page loading metric used is subjective and based on my personal experience with checkpoint set to background mode in URL filtering so pages load first and then checked ]</p><p></p><p>for max detection use all extensions above (slower page loading <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite111" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":(" /> )</p><p>for balanced use Symantec , Microsoft and checkpoint (slightly slower to somewhat slower and recommended by me )</p><p>for fast page loading and low false postives use checkpoint and Microsoft (shouldn't feel a difference)</p><p>for low ram option use trafficlight and Microsoft (slightly slower page loading )</p><p>for low ram and fast page loading as well as low false positives use Microsoft only (shouldn't feel a difference)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>anyone doing a similar test please use <em>aa419 - Fake Sites Database</em> and some new pishing links as its easy to get good detection against openpish free feed , other some free feeds</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Vitali Ortzi, post: 1112226, member: 57714"] [MEDIA=youtube]zhaOkUL7xDA[/MEDIA] showcasing how extensions can add a lot of added detection against phishing with all pishing links in the video detected by category blocking as the only link not detected was a false positive at 6:55 (there is zero phishing tech in checkpoint extension that wasn't showcased as everything was blocked purely by category blocking ) note checkpoint and symantec have been configured and aren't in default config (changes are mainly added categories ) extensions used in the test : checkpoint [URL='https://malwaretips.com/threads/extension-checkpoint-harmony-web-protection.133377/']Serious Discussion - [Extension]Checkpoint harmony web protection[/URL] symantec [URL='https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/symantec-browser-protecti/hielpjjagjimpgppnopiibaefhfpbpfn']Symantec Browser Protection - Chrome Web Store[/URL] trafficlight [URL='https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/trafficlight/cfnpidifppmenkapgihekkeednfoenal']TrafficLight - Chrome Web Store[/URL] microsoft [URL='https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/microsoft-defender-browse/bkbeeeffjjeopflfhgeknacdieedcoml']Microsoft Defender Browser Protection - Chrome Web Store[/URL] feeds used for the test : [CODE]https://db.aa419.org/fakebankslist.php https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Phishing-Database/Phishing.Database/refs/heads/master/phishing-links-NEW-today.txt https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openphish/public_feed/refs/heads/main/feed.txt[/CODE] performance related data (symantec isnt popular enough to get tested by debug bear lookup and only an older version of checkpoint extension was tested by debug bear ) [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.debugbear.com/chrome-extension-performance-lookup[/URL] [ATTACH alt="Screenshot 2024-12-23 074047.png"]286755[/ATTACH][ATTACH alt="trafficlight.png"]286757[/ATTACH][ATTACH alt="websecure (older vesrion of checkpoint) .png"]286759[/ATTACH] idle usage (symantec , checkpoint services running with zero cpu usage and around 30mb+ ram each ) [ATTACH alt="idle.png"]286760[/ATTACH] possible configs [ page loading metric used is subjective and based on my personal experience with checkpoint set to background mode in URL filtering so pages load first and then checked ] for max detection use all extensions above (slower page loading :( ) for balanced use Symantec , Microsoft and checkpoint (slightly slower to somewhat slower and recommended by me ) for fast page loading and low false postives use checkpoint and Microsoft (shouldn't feel a difference) for low ram option use trafficlight and Microsoft (slightly slower page loading ) for low ram and fast page loading as well as low false positives use Microsoft only (shouldn't feel a difference) anyone doing a similar test please use [I]aa419 - Fake Sites Database[/I] and some new pishing links as its easy to get good detection against openpish free feed , other some free feeds [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
